Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/30817
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLozano, Clémenten_UK
dc.contributor.authorMatallana-Surget, Sabineen_UK
dc.contributor.authorGivens, Justinaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorNouet, Saloméen_UK
dc.contributor.authorArbuckle, Louiseen_UK
dc.contributor.authorLambert, Zacharieen_UK
dc.contributor.authorLebaron, Philippeen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-25T01:02:47Z-
dc.date.available2020-03-25T01:02:47Z-
dc.date.issued2020-06-20en_UK
dc.identifier.other137803en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/30817-
dc.description.abstractOrganic UV filters are of emerging concern due to their occurrence and persistence in coastal ecosystems. Because marine bacteria are crucial in the major biogeochemical cycles, there is an urgent need to understand to what extent these microorganisms are affected by those chemicals. This study deciphers the impact of five common sunscreen UV filters on twenty-seven marine bacteria, combining both photobiology and toxicity analysis on environmentally relevant species. Seven bacteria were sensitive to different organic UV filters at 1000 μg L−1, including octinoxate and oxybenzone. This is the first report demonstrating inhibition of bacterial growth from 100 μg L−1. None of the UV filters showed any toxicity at 1000 μg L−1 on stationary phase cells, demonstrating that physiological state was found to be a key parameter in the bacterial response to UV-filters. Indeed, non-growing bacteria were resistant to UV filters whereas growing cells exhibited UV filter dependent sensitivity. Octinoxate was the most toxic chemical at 1000 μg L−1 on growing cells. Interestingly, photobiology experiments revealed that the toxicity of octinoxate and homosalate decreased after light exposure while the other compounds were not affected. In terms of environmental risk characterization, our results revealed that the increasing use of sun blockers could have detrimental impacts on bacterioplanktonic communities in coastal areas. Our findings contribute to a better understanding of the impact of the most common UV filters on bacterial species and corroborate the importance to consider environmental parameters such as solar radiation in ecotoxicology studies.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherElsevier BVen_UK
dc.relationLozano C, Matallana-Surget S, Givens J, Nouet S, Arbuckle L, Lambert Z & Lebaron P (2020) Toxicity of UV filters on marine bacteria: Combined effects with damaging solar radiation. Science of The Total Environment, 722, Art. No.: 137803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137803en_UK
dc.rightsThis is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons CC-BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. You are not required to obtain permission to reuse this article.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectUV filtersen_UK
dc.subjectMicrobial ecotoxicologyen_UK
dc.subjectPhototoxicityen_UK
dc.subjectMarine bacteriaen_UK
dc.titleToxicity of UV filters on marine bacteria: Combined effects with damaging solar radiationen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137803en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid32197158en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleScience of the Total Environmenten_UK
dc.citation.issn1879-1026en_UK
dc.citation.issn0048-9697en_UK
dc.citation.volume722en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.contributor.funderThe Carnegie Trusten_UK
dc.citation.date07/03/2020en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBiological and Environmental Sciencesen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBiological and Environmental Sciencesen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSorbonne Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSorbonne Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSorbonne Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSorbonne Universityen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000535470300011en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85082101726en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1585207en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-6023-3215en_UK
dc.date.accepted2020-03-06en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-03-06en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2020-03-24en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorLozano, Clément|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMatallana-Surget, Sabine|0000-0002-6023-3215en_UK
local.rioxx.authorGivens, Justina|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorNouet, Salomé|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorArbuckle, Louise|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorLambert, Zacharie|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorLebaron, Philippe|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectProject ID unknown|The Carnegie Trust|en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2020-03-24en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2020-03-24|en_UK
local.rioxx.filename1-s2.0-S0048969720313152-main.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1879-1026en_UK
Appears in Collections:Biological and Environmental Sciences Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1-s2.0-S0048969720313152-main.pdfFulltext - Published Version3.1 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.