|Appears in Collections:||Biological and Environmental Sciences Journal Articles|
|Peer Review Status:||Refereed|
|Title:||The use of operationally-defined sequential Fe extraction methods for mineralogical applications: a cautionary tale from Mössbauer spectroscopy|
|Citation:||Hepburn L, Butler I, Boyce A & Schroeder C (2020) The use of operationally-defined sequential Fe extraction methods for mineralogical applications: a cautionary tale from Mössbauer spectroscopy. Chemical Geology, 543, Art. No.: 119584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2020.119584|
|Abstract:||Reactive iron minerals are crucial components of global nutrient cycles, directly controlling carbon transport and storage in marine sediments. Sequential selective extraction is frequently used for quantitatively characterising, and chemically isolating, individual Fe mineral phases. Reagent-specific mineral solubility is fundamental to the success of any sequential extraction, but is strongly affected by the varying physical and chemical morphology intrinsic to natural mineral samples. Natural sediment, rock, and soil samples often contain a mineral mixture, which further modifies solvent efficacy. 57Fe Mössbauer spectroscopy only probes the hyperfine interactions between next-nearest neighbouring atomic nuclei in the crystal lattice and is less affected by variation in mineral grain size and crystallinity than conventional, X-ray-based methods. In this study, we used Mössbauer spectroscopy in a novel context to cross-calibrate and optimise a popular, but frequently misused, sequential Fe extraction protocol. Our results showed that incomplete and premature removal of the target Fe minerals could occur at nearly every stage of the extraction and, in many cases, the leachate Fe content did not represent the target phase at all. Crystalline, natural siderite and amorphous, synthetic goethite were detected in the Mössbauer spectrum of the ammonium oxalate extraction for magnetite, after which all reactive Fe minerals should have been removed. Consistent with previous studies, and unlike many other clay minerals, nontronite was extracted as part of the highly reactive Fe pool, and in fact our data indicate that this mineral was extracted by the initial Na-acetate extraction that targets 'carbonate-bound Fe'. Matrix effects appeared to cause variable yield efficiencies: synthetic goethite was successfully removed when present as an individual mineral yet persisted beyond its target extraction when present in an Fe mineral mixture. Although suitable for the quantification of operationally-defined Fe pools, we caution the unverified use of sequential Fe extraction protocols for mineral specific applications. The application of sequential Fe extractions to define the reactive Fe pools as a paleoredox proxy of depositional conditions appears relatively robust. The premature removal of 2-line ferrihydrite observed in this study (due to the use of the more aggressive Na-acetate extraction for crystalline siderite), does not limit the quantitative use of the sequential Fe extraction in ancient sediments, where such 'easily reducible' oxides are unlikely to persist. In contrast, attributing the outcomes of operationally-defined Fe pools to specific Fe minerals is precarious and potentially entirely erroneous. Where Fe mineral specificity or separation is required, we recommend post-extraction validation by another secondary technique. Mössbauer spectroscopy offers such a method that can independently verify extraction stages and assess mineral specificity.|
|Rights:||This item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study. Accepted refereed manuscript of: Hepburn L, Butler I, Boyce A & Schroeder C (2020) The use of operationally-defined sequential Fe extraction methods for mineralogical applications: a cautionary tale from Mössbauer spectroscopy. Chemical Geology, 543, Art. No.: 119584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2020.119584 © 2020, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/|
|Hepburn-Etal-2020-The-use-of-operationally-defined-sequential-Fe-extraction-methods-for-mineralogical-applications.pdf||Fulltext - Accepted Version||2.86 MB||Adobe PDF||Under Embargo until 2021-03-14 Request a copy|
Note: If any of the files in this item are currently embargoed, you can request a copy directly from the author by clicking the padlock icon above. However, this facility is dependent on the depositor still being contactable at their original email address.
This item is protected by original copyright
A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact email@example.com providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.