Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/30761
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorClarkson, Tessa R.en_UK
dc.contributor.authorSidari, Morgan Jen_UK
dc.contributor.authorSains, Rosannaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorAlexander, Meredithen_UK
dc.contributor.authorHarrison, Melissaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMefodeva, Valeriyaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorPearson, Samuelen_UK
dc.contributor.authorLee, Anthony Jen_UK
dc.contributor.authorDixson, Barnaby J Wen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-29T01:17:34Z-
dc.date.available2020-02-29T01:17:34Z-
dc.date.issued2020-01en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/30761-
dc.description.abstractThe strength and direction of sexual selection via female choice on masculine facial traits in men is a paradox in human mate choice research. While masculinity may communicate benefits to women and offspring directly (i.e. resources) or indirectly (i.e. health), masculine men may be costly as long-term partners owing to lower paternal investment. Mating strategy theory suggests women's preferences for masculine traits are strongest when the costs associated with masculinity are reduced. This study takes a multivariate approach to testing whether women's mate preferences are context-dependent. Women (n = 919) rated attractiveness when considering long-term and short-term relationships for male faces varying in beardedness (clean-shaven and full beards) and facial masculinity (30% and 60% feminized, unmanipulated, 30% and 60% masculinized). Participants then completed scales measuring pathogen, sexual and moral disgust, disgust towards ectoparasites, reproductive ambition, self-perceived mate value and the facial hair in partners and fathers. In contrast to past research, we found no associations between pathogen disgust, self-perceived mate value or reproductive ambition and facial masculinity preferences. However, we found a significant positive association between moral disgust and preferences for masculine faces and bearded faces. Preferences for beards were lower among women with higher ectoparasite disgust, providing evidence for ectoparasite avoidance hypothesis. However, women reporting higher pathogen disgust gave higher attractiveness ratings for bearded faces than women reporting lower pathogen disgust, providing support for parasite-stress theories of sexual selection and mate choice. Preferences for beards were also highest among single and married women with the strongest reproductive ambition. Overall, our results reflect mixed associations between individual differences in mating strategies and women's mate preferences for masculine facial traits.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherThe Royal Societyen_UK
dc.relationClarkson TR, Sidari MJ, Sains R, Alexander M, Harrison M, Mefodeva V, Pearson S, Lee AJ & Dixson BJW (2020) A multivariate analysis of women's mating strategies and sexual selection on men's facial morphology. Royal Society Open Science, 7 (1), p. 191209. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.191209en_UK
dc.rights© 2020 The Authors. Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectfacial masculinityen_UK
dc.subjectmate choiceen_UK
dc.subjectfacial attractivenessen_UK
dc.subjectfacial hairen_UK
dc.subjectsexual selectionen_UK
dc.subjecthuman evolutionen_UK
dc.titleA multivariate analysis of women's mating strategies and sexual selection on men's facial morphologyen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1098/rsos.191209en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid32218951en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleRoyal Society Open Scienceen_UK
dc.citation.issn2054-5703en_UK
dc.citation.volume7en_UK
dc.citation.issue1en_UK
dc.citation.spage191209en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.contributor.funderUniversity of Queenslanden_UK
dc.author.emailanthony.lee@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date15/01/2020en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Queenslanden_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Queenslanden_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Queenslanden_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Queenslanden_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Queenslanden_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Queenslanden_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Queenslanden_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPsychologyen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Queenslanden_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000507382300016en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85079667911en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1512712en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-8288-3393en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-0911-1244en_UK
dc.date.accepted2019-11-26en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2019-11-26en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2020-01-24en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorClarkson, Tessa R.|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorSidari, Morgan J|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorSains, Rosanna|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorAlexander, Meredith|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorHarrison, Melissa|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMefodeva, Valeriya|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorPearson, Samuel|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorLee, Anthony J|0000-0001-8288-3393en_UK
local.rioxx.authorDixson, Barnaby J W|0000-0003-0911-1244en_UK
local.rioxx.projectUQ Post Doctoral Fellowship - Dr Barnaby Dixson|University of Queensland|en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2020-01-24en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2020-01-24|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenamersos.191209.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source2054-5703en_UK
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
rsos.191209.pdfFulltext - Published Version1.29 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.