Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/30758
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGrant, Aileenen_UK
dc.contributor.authorCurrie, Sineaden_UK
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-29T01:16:11Z-
dc.date.available2020-02-29T01:16:11Z-
dc.date.issued2020en_UK
dc.identifier.other9en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/30758-
dc.description.abstractBackground Childbirth is a major risk factor for urinary incontinence (UI). As a result, pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) is commonly recommended during and after pregnancy to prevent the onset of UI. PFMT is often classed as a physical activity (PA) behaviour, hence PA guidelines for postnatal women encourage PFMT alongside aerobic activities. However, postnatal lifestyle interventions tend to overlook PFMT which can be detrimental to women’s health and future health risks, including urinary incontinence. This study aimed to explore perceptions and acceptability of a postnatal physical activity and PFMT intervention with postnatal women in Scotland. Methods We recruited women who had given birth within the last 5 years by displaying posters in health centres and community centres in Stirling and through Facebook. Data was gathered via online and face-to-face focus groups, that were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Analytic themes were initially organised under related concepts derived from the topic guide and thematic analysis conducted. Subsequent analysis was by the Framework technique. Results A total of seven online and face-to-face focus group discussions with 31 women identified there was a clear intention behaviour gap for engagement in PA, with both psychological and logistical barriers identified such as motivation and childcare. This was distinct from PFMT where there was a feeling of helplessness around not knowing how to perform a correct PFMT contraction subsequently resulting in women not adhering to PFMT guidance. Women felt there was no accessible PFMT advice available through the NHS. Some participants had received PFMT advice after childbirth and spoke of the Squeezee app being useful in adhering to a PFMT regimen but they did require additional teaching on how to do correct contractions. There was need for clarity and practical support for PFMT in the postnatal period with an approved intervention incorporating an accessible app being suggested by participants. Conclusions Women would like to be trained on postnatal PFMT but face barriers to accessing adequate information and education on how to do a PFMT contraction. An intervention combining PFMT training and an app would be the most useful for their needs and circumstances.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLCen_UK
dc.relationGrant A & Currie S (2020) Qualitative exploration of the acceptability of a postnatal pelvic floor muscle training intervention to prevent urinary incontinence. BMC Women's Health, 20 (1), Art. No.: 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-019-0878-zen_UK
dc.rightsThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectUrinary incontinenceen_UK
dc.subjectPelvic floor muscle trainingen_UK
dc.subjectPhysical activityen_UK
dc.subjectPostnatal careen_UK
dc.titleQualitative exploration of the acceptability of a postnatal pelvic floor muscle training intervention to prevent urinary incontinenceen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12905-019-0878-zen_UK
dc.identifier.pmid31952500en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleBMC Women's Healthen_UK
dc.citation.issn1472-6874en_UK
dc.citation.volume20en_UK
dc.citation.issue1en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.citation.date17/01/2020en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationRobert Gordon Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPsychologyen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000521239800001en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85078017814en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1534481en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-6146-101Xen_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-7565-4012en_UK
dc.date.accepted2019-12-30en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2019-12-30en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2020-01-29en_UK
rioxxterms.apcpaiden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorGrant, Aileen|0000-0001-6146-101Xen_UK
local.rioxx.authorCurrie, Sinead|0000-0002-7565-4012en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2020-01-29en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2020-01-29|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenames12905-019-0878-z.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1472-6874en_UK
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
s12905-019-0878-z.pdfFulltext - Published Version533.56 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.