Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1893/30736
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Neilson, Laura J | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Patterson, Joanne | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | von Wagner, Christian | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Hewitson, Paul | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | McGregor, Lesley M | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Sharp, Linda | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Rees, Colin J | en_UK |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-02-29T01:08:30Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-02-29T01:08:30Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2020-04-03 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1893/30736 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Background Measuring patient experience is important for evaluating the quality of patient care, identifying aspects requiring improvement and optimising patient outcomes. Patient Reported Experience Measures (PREMs) should, ideally, be patient derived, however no such PREMs for gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy exist. This study explored the experiences of patients undergoing GI endoscopy and CT colonography (CTC) in order to: identify aspects of care important to them; determine whether the same themes are relevant across investigative modalities; develop the framework for a GI endoscopy PREM. Methods Patients aged ≥18 years who had undergone oesophagogastroduodenoscopy (OGD), colonoscopy or CTC for symptoms or surveillance (but not within the national bowel cancer screening programme) in one hospital were invited to participate in semi-structured interviews. Recruitment continued until data saturation. Inductive thematic analysis was undertaken. Results 35 patients were interviewed (15 OGD, 10 colonoscopy, 10 CTC). Most patients described their experience chronologically, and five ‘procedural stages’ were evident: before attending for the test; preparing for the test; at the hospital, before the test; during the test; after the test. Six themes were identified: anxiety; expectations; choice & control; communication & information; comfort; embarrassment & dignity. These were present for all three procedures but not all procedure stages. Some themes were inter-related (eg, expectations & anxiety; communication & anxiety). Conclusion We identified six key themes encapsulating patient experience of GI procedures and these themes were evident for all procedures and across multiple procedure stages. These findings will be used to inform the development of the Newcastle ENDOPREM™. | en_UK |
dc.language.iso | en | en_UK |
dc.publisher | BMJ Publishing Group | en_UK |
dc.relation | Neilson LJ, Patterson J, von Wagner C, Hewitson P, McGregor LM, Sharp L & Rees CJ (2020) Patient experience of gastrointestinal endoscopy: Informing the development of the Newcastle ENDOPREM. Frontline Gastroenterology, 11 (3), pp. 209-217. https://doi.org/10.1136/flgastro-2019-101321 | en_UK |
dc.rights | This article has been accepted for publication in Frontline Gastroenterology, 2019 following peer review, and the Version of Record can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1136/flgastro-2019-101321. © Authors Reuse of this manuscript version (excluding any databases, tables, diagrams, photographs and other images or illustrative material included where a another copyright owner is identified) is permitted strictly pursuant to the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC-BY-NC 4.0) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 | en_UK |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ | en_UK |
dc.title | Patient experience of gastrointestinal endoscopy: Informing the development of the Newcastle ENDOPREM | en_UK |
dc.type | Journal Article | en_UK |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1136/flgastro-2019-101321 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.pmid | 32419912 | en_UK |
dc.citation.jtitle | Frontline Gastroenterology | en_UK |
dc.citation.issn | 2041-4145 | en_UK |
dc.citation.issn | 2041-4137 | en_UK |
dc.citation.volume | 11 | en_UK |
dc.citation.issue | 3 | en_UK |
dc.citation.spage | 209 | en_UK |
dc.citation.epage | 217 | en_UK |
dc.citation.publicationstatus | Published | en_UK |
dc.citation.peerreviewed | Refereed | en_UK |
dc.type.status | AM - Accepted Manuscript | en_UK |
dc.contributor.funder | National Institute for Health Research | en_UK |
dc.citation.date | 13/01/2020 | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | South Tyneside NHS Foundation Trust | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Newcastle University | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | University College London | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | University of Oxford | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Psychology | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Newcastle University | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Newcastle University | en_UK |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-85077894083 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.wtid | 1537951 | en_UK |
dc.contributor.orcid | 0000-0002-7093-1391 | en_UK |
dc.date.accepted | 2019-12-13 | en_UK |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2019-12-13 | en_UK |
dc.date.filedepositdate | 2020-02-12 | en_UK |
rioxxterms.apc | not required | en_UK |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_UK |
rioxxterms.version | AM | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Neilson, Laura J| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Patterson, Joanne| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | von Wagner, Christian| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Hewitson, Paul| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | McGregor, Lesley M|0000-0002-7093-1391 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Sharp, Linda| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Rees, Colin J| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.project | Project ID unknown|National Institute for Health Research|http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000272 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate | 2020-02-12 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.licence | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/|2020-02-12| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.filename | ENDOPREM FG resubmission 101119 untracked.pdf | en_UK |
local.rioxx.filecount | 1 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.source | 2041-4145 | en_UK |
Appears in Collections: | Psychology Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
ENDOPREM FG resubmission 101119 untracked.pdf | Fulltext - Accepted Version | 364.49 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is protected by original copyright |
A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.