Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/30736
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNeilson, Laura Jen_UK
dc.contributor.authorPatterson, Joanneen_UK
dc.contributor.authorvon Wagner, Christianen_UK
dc.contributor.authorHewitson, Paulen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMcGregor, Lesley Men_UK
dc.contributor.authorSharp, Lindaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorRees, Colin Jen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-29T01:08:30Z-
dc.date.available2020-02-29T01:08:30Z-
dc.date.issued2020-04-03en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/30736-
dc.description.abstractBackground Measuring patient experience is important for evaluating the quality of patient care, identifying aspects requiring improvement and optimising patient outcomes. Patient Reported Experience Measures (PREMs) should, ideally, be patient derived, however no such PREMs for gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy exist. This study explored the experiences of patients undergoing GI endoscopy and CT colonography (CTC) in order to: identify aspects of care important to them; determine whether the same themes are relevant across investigative modalities; develop the framework for a GI endoscopy PREM. Methods Patients aged ≥18 years who had undergone oesophagogastroduodenoscopy (OGD), colonoscopy or CTC for symptoms or surveillance (but not within the national bowel cancer screening programme) in one hospital were invited to participate in semi-structured interviews. Recruitment continued until data saturation. Inductive thematic analysis was undertaken. Results 35 patients were interviewed (15 OGD, 10 colonoscopy, 10 CTC). Most patients described their experience chronologically, and five ‘procedural stages’ were evident: before attending for the test; preparing for the test; at the hospital, before the test; during the test; after the test. Six themes were identified: anxiety; expectations; choice & control; communication & information; comfort; embarrassment & dignity. These were present for all three procedures but not all procedure stages. Some themes were inter-related (eg, expectations & anxiety; communication & anxiety). Conclusion We identified six key themes encapsulating patient experience of GI procedures and these themes were evident for all procedures and across multiple procedure stages. These findings will be used to inform the development of the Newcastle ENDOPREM™.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Groupen_UK
dc.relationNeilson LJ, Patterson J, von Wagner C, Hewitson P, McGregor LM, Sharp L & Rees CJ (2020) Patient experience of gastrointestinal endoscopy: Informing the development of the Newcastle ENDOPREM. Frontline Gastroenterology, 11 (3), pp. 209-217. https://doi.org/10.1136/flgastro-2019-101321en_UK
dc.rightsThis article has been accepted for publication in Frontline Gastroenterology, 2019 following peer review, and the Version of Record can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1136/flgastro-2019-101321. © Authors Reuse of this manuscript version (excluding any databases, tables, diagrams, photographs and other images or illustrative material included where a another copyright owner is identified) is permitted strictly pursuant to the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC-BY-NC 4.0) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/en_UK
dc.titlePatient experience of gastrointestinal endoscopy: Informing the development of the Newcastle ENDOPREMen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/flgastro-2019-101321en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid32419912en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleFrontline Gastroenterologyen_UK
dc.citation.issn2041-4145en_UK
dc.citation.issn2041-4137en_UK
dc.citation.volume11en_UK
dc.citation.issue3en_UK
dc.citation.spage209en_UK
dc.citation.epage217en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusAM - Accepted Manuscripten_UK
dc.contributor.funderNational Institute for Health Researchen_UK
dc.citation.date13/01/2020en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSouth Tyneside NHS Foundation Trusten_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNewcastle Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity College Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Oxforden_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPsychologyen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNewcastle Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNewcastle Universityen_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85077894083en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1537951en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-7093-1391en_UK
dc.date.accepted2019-12-13en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2019-12-13en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2020-02-12en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionAMen_UK
local.rioxx.authorNeilson, Laura J|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorPatterson, Joanne|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorvon Wagner, Christian|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorHewitson, Paul|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMcGregor, Lesley M|0000-0002-7093-1391en_UK
local.rioxx.authorSharp, Linda|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorRees, Colin J|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectProject ID unknown|National Institute for Health Research|http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000272en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2020-02-12en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/|2020-02-12|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameENDOPREM FG resubmission 101119 untracked.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source2041-4145en_UK
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
ENDOPREM FG resubmission 101119 untracked.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version364.49 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.