|Appears in Collections:||Psychology Journal Articles|
|Peer Review Status:||Refereed|
|Title:||Impairment of Cyclopean Surface Processing by Disparity-Defined Masking Stimuli|
|Citation:||Goutcher R (2019) Impairment of Cyclopean Surface Processing by Disparity-Defined Masking Stimuli. Journal of Vision.|
|Abstract:||Binocular disparity signals allow for the estimation of three-dimensional shape, even in the absence of monocular depth cues. The perception of such disparity-defined form depends, however, on the linkage of multiple disparity measurements over space. Performance limitations in cyclopean tasks thus inform us about errors arising in disparity measurement and difficulties in the linkage of such measurements. We used a cyclopean orientation discrimination task to examine the perception of disparity-defined form. Participants were presented with random-dot sinusoidal modulations in depth, and asked to report whether they were clockwise, or counter-clockwise rotated. To assess the effect of different noise structures on measurement and linkage processes, task performance was measured in the presence of binocular, random-dot masks, structured as either anti-phase depth sinusoids, or as random distributions of dots in depth. For a fixed number of surface dots, the ratio of mask-to-surface dots was varied to obtain thresholds for orientation discrimination. Anti-phase masks were found to be more effective than random depth masks, requiring a lower mask-to-surface dot ratio to inhibit performance. For anti-phase masks, performance improved with decreased cyclopean frequency, increased disparity amplitude and/or an increase in the total number of stimulus dots. While a cross-correlation model of disparity measurement could account for anti-phase mask performance, random depth masking effects were consistent with limitations in relative disparity processing. This suggests that performance is noise-limited for anti-phase masks and complexity-limited for random masks. We propose that use of differing mask types may prove effective in understanding these distinct forms of impairment.|
|Rights:||The publisher does not allow this version of this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.|
|Notes:||Output Status: Forthcoming|
|Cyclopean Paper Final X.pdf||Fulltext - Accepted Version||872.89 kB||Adobe PDF||Under Permanent Embargo Request a copy|
Note: If any of the files in this item are currently embargoed, you can request a copy directly from the author by clicking the padlock icon above. However, this facility is dependent on the depositor still being contactable at their original email address.
This item is protected by original copyright
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.