Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/30582
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChalmers, Lynnen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMigaud, Herveen_UK
dc.contributor.authorAdams, Alexandraen_UK
dc.contributor.authorVera, Luisa Men_UK
dc.contributor.authorMcStay, Elsbethen_UK
dc.contributor.authorNorth, Benen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMitchell, Chrisen_UK
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, John Fen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-08T01:02:48Z-
dc.date.available2020-01-08T01:02:48Z-
dc.date.issued2020-02en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/30582-
dc.description.abstractWhile triploid Atlantic salmon represent a practical and affordable solution to the issues associated with sexual maturation in the salmonid aquaculture industry, empirical evidence suggests triploids are more susceptible to disease and vaccine side-effects than diploids. With vaccination now part of routine husbandry, it is essential their response be studied to confirm their suitability for commercial production. This study tested the response of triploid and diploid Atlantic salmon to vaccination with commercially available vaccines. Triploid and diploid Atlantic salmon siblings were injected with one of three commercial vaccines (or sham-vaccinated) and monitored for performance throughout a commercial production cycle. Sampling at smolt and harvest was undertaken along with individual weight and length assessments through the cycle. Antibody response to Aeromonas salmonicida vaccination was similar in both ploidy, with a positive response in vaccine-injected fish. For both adhesions and melanin, analysis found that higher scores were more likely to occur as the anticipated severity of the vaccine increased. In addition, for adhesion scores at smolt and melanin scores at smolt and harvest, triploids were statistically more likely to exhibit high scores than diploids. Triploids maintained a significantly higher body weight during freshwater and until 11 months post-seawater transfer, with diploids weighing significantly more at harvest. Growth, represented by thermal growth coefficient (TGC), decreased in both ploidy as the severity of adhesions increased, and regression patterns did not differ significantly between ploidy. Vertebral deformity prevalence was consistently higher in triploids (smolt 12.3 ± 4.5%; harvest 34.9 ± 5.9%) than diploids (smolt 0.8 ± 0.5%; harvest 15.9 ± 1.9%), with no significant difference between vaccine groups in each ploidy. This study demonstrates that triploids respond as well to vaccination as diploids and provides further supporting evidence of triploid robustness for commercial aquaculture.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherElsevier BVen_UK
dc.relationChalmers L, Migaud H, Adams A, Vera LM, McStay E, North B, Mitchell C & Taylor JF (2020) Response of triploid Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) to commercial vaccines. Fish and Shellfish Immunology, 97, pp. 624-636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsi.2019.12.070en_UK
dc.rightsThis is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons CC-BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. You are not required to obtain permission to reuse this article.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectTriploiden_UK
dc.subjectVaccinationen_UK
dc.subjectAdhesionsen_UK
dc.subjectVertebral deformityen_UK
dc.subjectPerformanceen_UK
dc.subjectSide-effectsen_UK
dc.titleResponse of triploid Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) to commercial vaccinesen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.fsi.2019.12.070en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleFish and Shellfish Immunologyen_UK
dc.citation.issn1095-9947en_UK
dc.citation.issn1050-4648en_UK
dc.citation.volume97en_UK
dc.citation.spage624en_UK
dc.citation.epage636en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.contributor.funderBiotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Councilen_UK
dc.citation.date23/12/2019en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationInstitute of Aquacultureen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationInstitute of Aquacultureen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationInstitute of Aquacultureen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationInstitute of Aquacultureen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationInstitute of Aquacultureen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPHARMAQen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPHARMAQen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationInstitute of Aquacultureen_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1502199en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-1271-2991en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-5404-7512en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-0999-055Xen_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-4370-7922en_UK
dc.date.accepted2019-12-21en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2019-12-21en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2020-01-07en_UK
rioxxterms.apcpaiden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorChalmers, Lynn|0000-0002-1271-2991en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMigaud, Herve|0000-0002-5404-7512en_UK
local.rioxx.authorAdams, Alexandra|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorVera, Luisa M|0000-0003-0999-055Xen_UK
local.rioxx.authorMcStay, Elsbeth|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorNorth, Ben|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMitchell, Chris|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorTaylor, John F|0000-0003-4370-7922en_UK
local.rioxx.projectProject ID unknown|Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council|http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000268en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2020-01-07en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2020-01-07|en_UK
local.rioxx.filename1-s2.0-S1050464819312057-main.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1095-9947en_UK
Appears in Collections:Aquaculture Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1-s2.0-S1050464819312057-main.pdfFulltext - Published Version6.31 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.