Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/30572
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTsairidou, Smaragdaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorHamilton, Alastairen_UK
dc.contributor.authorRobledo, Diegoen_UK
dc.contributor.authorBron, James Een_UK
dc.contributor.authorHouston, Ross Den_UK
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-21T01:00:24Z-
dc.date.available2019-12-21T01:00:24Z-
dc.date.issued2019-12en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/30572-
dc.description.abstractGenomic selection enables cumulative genetic gains in key production traits such as disease resistance, playing an important role in the economic and environmental sustainability of aquaculture production. However, it requires genome-wide genetic marker data on large populations, which can be prohibitively expensive. Genotype imputation is a cost-effective method for obtaining high-density genotypes, but its value in aquaculture breeding programs which are characterised by large full-sibling families has yet to be fully assessed. The aim of this study was to optimise the use of low-density genotypes and evaluate genotype imputation strategies for cost-effective genomic prediction. Phenotypes and genotypes (78,362 SNPs) were obtained for 610 individuals from a Scottish Atlantic salmon breeding program population (Landcatch, UK) challenged with sea lice, Lepeophtheirus salmonis. The genomic prediction accuracy of genomic selection was calculated using GBLUP approaches and compared across SNP panels of varying densities and composition, with and without imputation. Imputation was tested when parents were genotyped for the optimal SNP panel, and offspring were genotyped for a range of lower density imputation panels. Reducing SNP density had little impact on prediction accuracy until 5,000 SNPs, below which the accuracy dropped. Imputation accuracy increased with increasing imputation panel density. Genomic prediction accuracy when offspring were genotyped for just 200 SNPs, and parents for 5,000 SNPs, was 0.53. This accuracy was similar to the full high density and optimal density dataset, and markedly higher than using 200 SNPs without imputation. These results suggest that imputation from very low to medium density can be a cost-effective tool for genomic selection in Atlantic salmon breeding programs.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.relationTsairidou S, Hamilton A, Robledo D, Bron JE & Houston RD (2019) Optimizing Low-Cost Genotyping and Imputation Strategies for Genomic Selection in Atlantic Salmon. G3: Genes Genomes Genetics, 10 (2), pp. 581-590. https://doi.org/10.1534/g3.119.400800en_UK
dc.rightsCopyright © 2020 Tsairidou et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectSalmon Breedingen_UK
dc.subjectGenotype Imputationen_UK
dc.subjectAquacultureen_UK
dc.subjectSea Lice Resistanceen_UK
dc.subjectGenomic Predictionen_UK
dc.titleOptimizing Low-Cost Genotyping and Imputation Strategies for Genomic Selection in Atlantic Salmonen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1534/g3.119.400800en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleG3: Genes Genomes Geneticsen_UK
dc.citation.issn2160-1836en_UK
dc.citation.issn2160-1836en_UK
dc.citation.volume10en_UK
dc.citation.issue2en_UK
dc.citation.spage581en_UK
dc.citation.epage590en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.contributor.funderBiotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Councilen_UK
dc.contributor.funderBiotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Councilen_UK
dc.contributor.funderBiotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Councilen_UK
dc.contributor.funderScottish Aquaculture Innovation Centreen_UK
dc.citation.date11/12/2019en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Edinburghen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationHendrix Genetics BVen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Edinburghen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationInstitute of Aquacultureen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Edinburghen_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85079099696en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1499467en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-3544-0519en_UK
dc.date.accepted2019-12-03en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2019-12-03en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2019-12-20en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorTsairidou, Smaragda|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorHamilton, Alastair|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorRobledo, Diego|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBron, James E|0000-0003-3544-0519en_UK
local.rioxx.authorHouston, Ross D|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectProject ID unknown|Scottish Aquaculture Innovation Centre|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectProject ID unknown|Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council|http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000268en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2019-12-20en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2019-12-20|en_UK
local.rioxx.filename581.full.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source2160-1836en_UK
Appears in Collections:Aquaculture Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
581.full.pdfFulltext - Published Version1.71 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.