|Appears in Collections:||Psychology Journal Articles|
|Peer Review Status:||Refereed|
|Title:||Am I being watched? The role of researcher presence on toddlers' behaviour during 'everyday' pain experiences: A pilot study|
|Citation:||Caes L, O'Sullivan G, McGuire B & Roche M (2019) Am I being watched? The role of researcher presence on toddlers' behaviour during 'everyday' pain experiences: A pilot study. Psychology and Health. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2019.1707830|
|Abstract:||Objective: Paediatric research on ‘everyday’ pain experiences is sparse, stemming from a lack of appropriate methodologies. We explored the feasibility of two methodologies for conducting naturalistic observations of ‘everyday’ pains within family’s homes, against an established methodology for day-care observations. Design: Within family homes, video-cameras recorded a typical morning or afternoon (maximum three hours), either with, or without researcher presence. To compare feasibility, children in day-care were observed by researchers for three hours without video-recording. Outcome measures: logistics of observation, child pain behaviours, caregiver responses to child pain. Results: Thirteen children (Mage=45.4 months) were recorded at home, experiencing 14 pain events. Researcher presence increased child distress intensity, but reduced the number of pain events compared to sessions without a researcher. Thirty-two children (Mage=48.4 months) were observed in day-care, experiencing 44 pain events. Children experiencing pain events in day-care exhibited decreased distress and lower personal control than those observed at home. Across all conditions, caregivers engaged mostly in physical comfort. Researcher estimates of child pain were highest if scored while present in the home. Conclusions: Observing everyday pain events within the child’s natural environment is feasible and may provide insight into the social context of childhood pain experiences.|
|Rights:||This item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study. This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis Group in Psychology and Health on [31 Dec 2019, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/08870446.2019.1707830.|
|Notes:||Output Status: Forthcoming/Available Online|
|Pilot study results paper_FINAL.pdf||Fulltext - Accepted Version||1.29 MB||Adobe PDF||Under Embargo until 2021-01-01 Request a copy|
Note: If any of the files in this item are currently embargoed, you can request a copy directly from the author by clicking the padlock icon above. However, this facility is dependent on the depositor still being contactable at their original email address.
This item is protected by original copyright
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact email@example.com providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.