Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Appears in Collections:Management, Work and Organisation Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: 'To be understood as to understand': A readability analysis of public library acceptable use policies
Author(s): Robinson, Elaine
McMenemy, David
Keywords: Acceptable use
digital citizenship
equity of access
information policy
public libraries
Issue Date: 28-Aug-2019
Citation: Robinson E & McMenemy D (2019) 'To be understood as to understand': A readability analysis of public library acceptable use policies. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science.
Abstract: Acceptable Use Policies (AUPs) are documents stating the limitations users must agree to when first accessing information and communications technologies (ICTs) in organisations, such as employers, educational institutions and public libraries. AUPs lay out the parameters of acceptable use expected of someone accessing the ICT services provided, and should state in clear and understandable terms what behaviours will attract sanctions, both legal and in terms of restricting future access. Utilising a range of standard readability tests used to measure how understandable documents are, the paper investigates how readable the AUPs presented to public library patrons in the UK are in practice. Of the 206 AUPs in use across the local government departments who manage public library services 200 were obtained and subjected to a range of readability testing procedures. Four readability tests were used for analysis: the Flesch Reading Ease, the Coleman-Liau Index, the Gunning Fog Index and the SMOG Grade. Results for all four readability tests administered on all AUPs raise significant questions. For the Flesch Reading Ease score only 5.5% of AUPs scored at the standard readability level or higher (60+), and 8% scored at a very high level of difficulty akin to a piece of scientific writing. Similarly, for SMOG, only 7.5% of the 200 AUPs scored at the recommended level of 10. Likewise, very few AUPs scored at levels recommended for a general audience with either the Gunning Fog Index (11.5%) or the Coleman-Liau Index (2%). With such variability in readability, the fitness for purpose of the average AUP as a contract patrons must agree to can be called into question. This paper presents the first ever analysis of the readability of library AUPs in the literature. Recommendations are made as to how public library services may improve this aspect of practice.
DOI Link: 10.1177/0961000619871598
Rights: Robinson E & McMenemy D, 'To be understood as to understand': A readability analysis of public library acceptable use policies, Journal of Librarianship and Information Science (Forthcoming). Copyright © The Authors 2019. Reprinted by permission of SAGE Publications. DOI:
Notes: Output Status: Forthcoming/Available Online

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Robinson_McMenemy_JLIS2019_readability_analysis_of_public_library_acceptable_use_policies.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version413.8 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

This item is protected by original copyright

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.