Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/30226
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Predictors of intention translation in flexible sigmoidoscopy screening for colorectal cancer
Author(s): von Wagner, Christian
Bonello, Bernardette
Stoffel, Sandro T
Skrobanski, Hanna
Kerrison, Robert
McGregor, Lesley M
Keywords: cancer screening
flexible sigmoidoscopy
prospective questionnaire
intentions
attendance
Health Belief Model
Issue Date: Dec-2019
Citation: von Wagner C, Bonello B, Stoffel ST, Skrobanski H, Kerrison R & McGregor LM (2019) Predictors of intention translation in flexible sigmoidoscopy screening for colorectal cancer. Health Psychology, 38 (12), pp. 1083-1095. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000793
Abstract: Objective: This prospective study aimed to identify predictors of intention and subsequent attendance of flexible sigmoidoscopy screening using constructs derived from the Health Belief Model (HBM). Method: A total of 4,330 people aged 54 years and registered at 1 of 83 participating English general practices were sent a preinvitation questionnaire to assess sociodemographics, HBM variables including perceived benefits, barriers, seriousness, health motivation, and external cues to action as well a range of other constructs and personal characteristics known to relate to cancer screening. Results: Of the 1,578 respondents (36.4%), 1,555 (98.5%) answered the intention question: 52.9% stated definitely yes, 38.1% probably yes, 6.8% probably not, and 2.2% definitely not. Intentions were positively associated with a higher score on a scale of benefits (odds ratio [OR] = 4.62; 95% confidence intervals [CI; 3.24, 6.59]) and health motivation, that is, interest in other ways of preventing colorectal cancer (OR = 2.61; 95% CI [1.62, 4.22]), while a higher score on perceived barriers (OR = 0.19; 95% CI [0.12, 0.31]) and currently following recommended healthy lifestyle behaviors (OR = 0.31; 95% CI [0.16, 0.59]) were negatively associated. Attendance was verified for 922 intenders (65.2%) of whom 737 (79.9%) attended. Attendance was predicted by health motivation (OR = 1.75; 95% CI [1.07, 2.86]), perceived benefits (OR = 1.82; 95% CI [1.37, 2.43]), perceived barriers (OR = 0.47; 95% CI [0.32, 0.69]), individual-level deprivation (OR = 0.26; 95% CI [0.14, 0.50]), and having diabetes (OR = 0.48; 95% CI [0.25, 0.94]). Conclusion: This study supported the usefulness of the HBM in predicting cancer screening and was further enhanced by adding non-HBM variables such as individual socioeconomic deprivation and comorbidities.
DOI Link: 10.1037/hea0000793
Rights: ¬©American Psychological Association, 2019. This paper is not the copy of record and may not exactly replicate the authoritative document published in the APA journal. Please do not copy or cite without author's permission. The final article is available, upon publication, at: https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000793

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
HP_manuscript_revisions_Version 3_changes accepted_aug.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version876.2 kBAdobe PDFView/Open



This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.