Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/30122
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorvon Wagner, Christianen_UK
dc.contributor.authorBonello, Bernardetteen_UK
dc.contributor.authorStoffel, Sandroen_UK
dc.contributor.authorSkrobanski, Hannaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorFreeman, Madeleineen_UK
dc.contributor.authorKerrison, Robert Sen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMcGregor, Lesley Men_UK
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-20T00:03:48Z-
dc.date.available2019-09-20T00:03:48Z-
dc.date.issued2018en_UK
dc.identifier.other1161en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/30122-
dc.description.abstractBackground Participation in bowel scope screening (BSS) is low (43%), limiting its potential to reduce colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality. This study aimed to quantify the prevalence of barriers to BSS and examine the extent to which these barriers differed according to non-participant profiles: non-responders to the BSS invitation, active decliners of the invitation, and non-attenders of confirmed appointments. Methods Individuals invited for BSS between March 2013 and December 2015, across 28 General Practices in England, were sent a questionnaire. Questions measured initial interest in BSS, engagement with the information booklet, BSS participation, and, where applicable, reasons for BSS non-attendance. Chi-square tests of independence were performed to examine the relationship between barriers, non-participant groups and socio-demographic variables. Results 1478 (45.8%) questionnaires were returned for analysis: 1230 (83.2%) attended screening, 114 (7.7%) were non-responders to the BSS invitation, 100 (6.8%) were active decliners, and 34 (2.3%) were non-attenders. Non-responders were less likely to have read the whole information booklet than active decliners (x2 (2, N = 157) = 7.00, p = 0.008) and non-attenders (x2 (2, N = 101) = 8.07, p = 0.005). Non-responders also had lower initial interest in having BSS than either active decliners (x2 (2, N = 213) = 6.07, p = 0.014) or non-attenders (x2 (2, N = 146) = 32.93, p en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherBMCen_UK
dc.relationvon Wagner C, Bonello B, Stoffel S, Skrobanski H, Freeman M, Kerrison RS & McGregor LM (2018) Barriers to bowel scope (flexible sigmoidoscopy) screening: a comparison of non-responders, active decliners and non-attenders. BMC Public Health, 18, Art. No.: 1161. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-6071-8en_UK
dc.rights© The Author(s). 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stateden_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectBowel scopeen_UK
dc.subjectScreeningen_UK
dc.subjectColorectal canceren_UK
dc.subjectFlexible sigmoidoscopyen_UK
dc.subjectNon-attendanceen_UK
dc.titleBarriers to bowel scope (flexible sigmoidoscopy) screening: a comparison of non-responders, active decliners and non-attendersen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12889-018-6071-8en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid30290783en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleBMC Public Healthen_UK
dc.citation.issn1471-2458en_UK
dc.citation.volume18en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.contributor.funderCancer Research UKen_UK
dc.citation.date05/10/2018en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity College Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Glasgowen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity College Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity College Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity College Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity College Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity College Londonen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000463580400001en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85054458206en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1399328en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-7093-1391en_UK
dc.date.accepted2018-09-25en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2018-09-25en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2019-09-13en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorvon Wagner, Christian|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBonello, Bernardette|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorStoffel, Sandro|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorSkrobanski, Hanna|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorFreeman, Madeleine|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorKerrison, Robert S|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMcGregor, Lesley M|0000-0002-7093-1391en_UK
local.rioxx.projectProject ID unknown|Cancer Research UK|http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000289en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2019-09-19en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2019-09-19|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenames12889-018-6071-8.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1471-2458en_UK
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
s12889-018-6071-8.pdfFulltext - Published Version733.53 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.