Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1893/30118
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Kerrison, Robert S | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | McGregor, Lesley M | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Counsell, Nicholas | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Marshall, Sarah | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Prentice, Andrew | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Isitt, John | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Rees, Colin J | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | von Wagner, Christian | en_UK |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-09-20T00:02:50Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-09-20T00:02:50Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2018-11 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1893/30118 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Background We previously initiated a randomized controlled trial to test the effectiveness of two self-referral reminders and a theory-based leaflet (sent 12 and 24 months after the initial invitation) to increase participation within the English Bowel Scope Screening program. Purpose This study reports the results following the second reminder. Methods Men and women included in the initial sample (n = 1,383) were re-assessed for eligibility 24 months after their invitation (12 months after the first reminder) and excluded if they had attended screening, moved away, or died. Eligible adults received the same treatment they were allocated 12 months previous, that is, no reminder (“control”), or a self-referral reminder with either the standard information booklet (“Reminder and Standard Information Booklet”) or theory-based leaflet designed using the Behavior Change Wheel (“Reminder and Theory-Based Leaflet”). The primary outcome was the proportion screened within each group 12 weeks after the second reminder. Results In total, 1,218 (88.1%) individuals were eligible. Additional uptake following the second reminder was 0.4% (2/460), 4.8% (19/399), and 7.9% (29/366) in the control, Reminder and Standard Information Booklet, and Reminder and Theory-Based Leaflet groups, respectively. When combined with the first reminder, the overall uptake for each group was 0.7% (3/461), 14.5% (67/461), and 21.5% (99/461). Overall uptake was significantly higher in the Reminder and Standard Information Booklet and Reminder and Theory-Based Leaflet groups than in the control (odds ratio [OR] = 26.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 8.1–84.0, p < .001 and OR = 46.9, 95% CI = 14.7–149.9, p < .001, respectively), and significantly higher in the Reminder and Theory-Based Leaflet group than in the Reminder and Standard Information Booklet group (OR = 1.8, 95% CI = 1.3–2.6, p < .001). Conclusion A second reminder increased uptake among former nonparticipants. The added value of the theory-based leaflet highlights a potential benefit to reviewing the current information booklet. Trials Registry Number ISRCTN44293755. | en_UK |
dc.language.iso | en | en_UK |
dc.publisher | Oxford University Press | en_UK |
dc.relation | Kerrison RS, McGregor LM, Counsell N, Marshall S, Prentice A, Isitt J, Rees CJ & von Wagner C (2018) Use of Two Self-referral Reminders and a Theory-Based Leaflet to Increase the Uptake of Flexible Sigmoidoscopy in the English Bowel Scope Screening Program: Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial in London. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 52 (11), pp. 941-951. https://doi.org/10.1093/abm/kax068 | en_UK |
dc.rights | © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Behavioral Medicine. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. | en_UK |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | en_UK |
dc.subject | Colorectal cancer | en_UK |
dc.subject | Screening | en_UK |
dc.subject | Uptake | en_UK |
dc.subject | Flexible sigmoidoscopy | en_UK |
dc.subject | Behavioral science | en_UK |
dc.title | Use of Two Self-referral Reminders and a Theory-Based Leaflet to Increase the Uptake of Flexible Sigmoidoscopy in the English Bowel Scope Screening Program: Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial in London | en_UK |
dc.type | Journal Article | en_UK |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1093/abm/kax068 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.pmid | 30346495 | en_UK |
dc.citation.jtitle | Annals of Behavioral Medicine | en_UK |
dc.citation.issn | 1532-4796 | en_UK |
dc.citation.issn | 0883-6612 | en_UK |
dc.citation.volume | 52 | en_UK |
dc.citation.issue | 11 | en_UK |
dc.citation.spage | 941 | en_UK |
dc.citation.epage | 951 | en_UK |
dc.citation.publicationstatus | Published | en_UK |
dc.citation.peerreviewed | Refereed | en_UK |
dc.type.status | VoR - Version of Record | en_UK |
dc.contributor.funder | Cancer Research UK | en_UK |
dc.citation.date | 15/01/2018 | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | University College London | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | University College London | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | University College London | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Partners in Creation | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | South Tyneside NHS Foundation Trust | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | University College London | en_UK |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-85055073295 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.wtid | 1399353 | en_UK |
dc.contributor.orcid | 0000-0002-7093-1391 | en_UK |
dc.date.accepted | 2018-01-15 | en_UK |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2018-01-15 | en_UK |
dc.date.filedepositdate | 2019-09-17 | en_UK |
rioxxterms.apc | not required | en_UK |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_UK |
rioxxterms.version | VoR | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Kerrison, Robert S| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | McGregor, Lesley M|0000-0002-7093-1391 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Counsell, Nicholas| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Marshall, Sarah| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Prentice, Andrew| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Isitt, John| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Rees, Colin J| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | von Wagner, Christian| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.project | Project ID unknown|Cancer Research UK|http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000289 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate | 2019-09-19 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.licence | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2019-09-19| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.filename | kax068.pdf | en_UK |
local.rioxx.filecount | 1 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.source | 1532-4796 | en_UK |
Appears in Collections: | Psychology Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
kax068.pdf | Fulltext - Published Version | 651.82 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is protected by original copyright |
A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.