Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1893/30114
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Smith, Samuel G | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Wardle, Jane | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Atkin, Wendy | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Raine, Rosalind | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | McGregor, Lesley M | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Vart, Gemma | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Morris, Steve | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Duffy, Stephen W | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Moss, Susan | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Hackshaw, Allan | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Halloran, Stephen | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Kralj-Hans, Ines | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Howe, Rosemary | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Snowball, Julia | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Handley, Graham | en_UK |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-09-20T00:01:44Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-09-20T00:01:44Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2017-08-14 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.other | 543 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1893/30114 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Background Uptake of colorectal cancer screening is low in the English NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (BCSP). Participation in screening is strongly associated with socioeconomic status. The aim of this study was to determine whether a supplementary leaflet providing the ‘gist’ of guaiac-based Faecal Occult Blood test (gFOBt) screening for colorectal cancer could reduce the socioeconomic status (SES) gradient in uptake in the English NHS BCSP. Methods The trial was integrated within routine BCSP operations in November 2012. Using a cluster randomised controlled design all adults aged 59–74 years who were being routinely invited to complete the gFOBt were randomised based on day of invitation. The Index of Multiple Deprivation was used to create SES quintiles. The control group received the standard information booklet (‘SI’). The intervention group received the SI booklet and the Gist leaflet (‘SI + Gist’) which had been designed to help people with lower literacy engage with the invitation. Blinding of hubs was not possible and invited subjects were not made aware of a comparator condition. The primary outcome was the gradient in uptake across IMD quintiles. Results In November 2012, 163,525 individuals were allocated to either the ‘SI’ intervention (n = 79,104) or the ‘SI + Gist’ group (n = 84,421). Overall uptake was similar between the intervention and control groups (SI: 57.3% and SI + Gist: 57.6%; OR = 1.02, 95% CI: 0.92–1.13, p = 0.77). Uptake was 42.0% (SI) vs. 43.0% (SI + Gist) in the most deprived quintile and 65.6% vs. 65.8% in the least deprived quintile (interaction p = 0.48). The SES gradient in uptake was similar between the study groups within age, gender, hub and screening round sub-groups. Conclusions Providing supplementary simplified information in addition to the standard information booklet did not reduce the SES gradient in uptake in the NHS BCSP. The effectiveness of the Gist leaflet when used alone should be explored in future research. | en_UK |
dc.language.iso | en | en_UK |
dc.publisher | BMC | en_UK |
dc.relation | Smith SG, Wardle J, Atkin W, Raine R, McGregor LM, Vart G, Morris S, Duffy SW, Moss S, Hackshaw A, Halloran S, Kralj-Hans I, Howe R, Snowball J & Handley G (2017) Reducing the socioeconomic gradient in uptake of the NHS bowel cancer screening Programme using a simplified supplementary information leaflet: a cluster-randomised trial. BMC Cancer, 17, Art. No.: 543. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3512-1 | en_UK |
dc.rights | This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. | en_UK |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | en_UK |
dc.subject | Cancer | en_UK |
dc.subject | oncology | en_UK |
dc.subject | socioeconomic inequalities | en_UK |
dc.subject | Colorectal cancer screening | en_UK |
dc.subject | Fuzzy trace theory | en_UK |
dc.subject | Gist | en_UK |
dc.title | Reducing the socioeconomic gradient in uptake of the NHS bowel cancer screening Programme using a simplified supplementary information leaflet: a cluster-randomised trial | en_UK |
dc.type | Journal Article | en_UK |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1186/s12885-017-3512-1 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.pmid | 28806955 | en_UK |
dc.citation.jtitle | BMC Cancer | en_UK |
dc.citation.issn | 1471-2407 | en_UK |
dc.citation.volume | 17 | en_UK |
dc.citation.publicationstatus | Published | en_UK |
dc.citation.peerreviewed | Refereed | en_UK |
dc.type.status | VoR - Version of Record | en_UK |
dc.contributor.funder | National Institute for Health Research | en_UK |
dc.citation.date | 14/08/2017 | en_UK |
dc.description.notes | Additional co-authors: Richard F Logan, Sandra Rainbow, Steve Smith, Mary Thomas, Nicholas Counsell and Christian von Wagner | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Psychosocial Oncology and Clinical Practice Research Group, University of Leeds | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | University College London | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Imperial College London | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | University College London | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | University College London | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | University of London | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | University College London | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Queen Mary, University of London | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Queen Mary, University of London | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | University College London | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | King's College London | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Imperial College London | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Gateshead Health NHS Foundation Trust | en_UK |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000408031800002 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-85027247509 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.wtid | 1399364 | en_UK |
dc.contributor.orcid | 0000-0002-7093-1391 | en_UK |
dc.date.accepted | 2017-07-28 | en_UK |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2017-07-28 | en_UK |
dc.date.filedepositdate | 2019-09-17 | en_UK |
rioxxterms.apc | not required | en_UK |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_UK |
rioxxterms.version | VoR | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Smith, Samuel G| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Wardle, Jane| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Atkin, Wendy| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Raine, Rosalind| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | McGregor, Lesley M|0000-0002-7093-1391 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Vart, Gemma| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Morris, Steve| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Duffy, Stephen W| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Moss, Susan| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Hackshaw, Allan| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Halloran, Stephen| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Kralj-Hans, Ines| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Howe, Rosemary| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Snowball, Julia| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Handley, Graham| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.project | Project ID unknown|National Institute for Health Research|http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000272 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate | 2019-09-19 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.licence | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2019-09-19| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.filename | s12885-017-3512-1.pdf | en_UK |
local.rioxx.filecount | 1 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.source | 1471-2407 | en_UK |
Appears in Collections: | Psychology Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
s12885-017-3512-1.pdf | Fulltext - Published Version | 419.47 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is protected by original copyright |
A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.