Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/30099
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHarper, Lynsey Ren_UK
dc.contributor.authorLawson Handley, Lorien_UK
dc.contributor.authorCarpenter, Angus Ien_UK
dc.contributor.authorGhazali, Muhammaden_UK
dc.contributor.authorDi Muri, Cristinaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMacgregor, Callum Jen_UK
dc.contributor.authorLogan, Thomas Wen_UK
dc.contributor.authorLaw, Alanen_UK
dc.contributor.authorBreithaupt, Thomasen_UK
dc.contributor.authorRead, Daniel Sen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMcDevitt, Allan Den_UK
dc.contributor.authorHänfling, Bernden_UK
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-18T00:01:00Z-
dc.date.available2019-09-18T00:01:00Z-
dc.date.issued2019-10en_UK
dc.identifier.other108225en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/30099-
dc.description.abstractEnvironmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding can identify terrestrial taxa utilising aquatic habitats alongside aquatic communities, but terrestrial species' eDNA dynamics are understudied. We evaluated eDNA metabarcoding for monitoring semi-aquatic and terrestrial mammals, specifically nine species of conservation or management concern, and examined spatiotemporal variation in mammal eDNA signals. We hypothesised eDNA signals would be stronger for semi-aquatic than terrestrial mammals, and at sites where individuals exhibited behaviours. In captivity, we sampled waterbodies at points where behaviours were observed (‘directed’ sampling) and at equidistant intervals along the shoreline (‘stratified’ sampling). We surveyed natural ponds (N = 6) where focal species were present using stratified water sampling, camera traps, and field signs. eDNA samples were metabarcoded using vertebrate-specific primers. All focal species were detected in captivity. eDNA signal strength did not differ between directed and stratified samples across or within species, between semi-aquatic or terrestrial species, or according to behaviours. eDNA was evenly distributed in artificial waterbodies, but unevenly distributed in natural ponds. Survey methods deployed at natural ponds shared three species detections. Metabarcoding missed badger and red fox recorded by cameras and field signs, but detected small mammals these tools overlooked, e.g. water vole. Terrestrial mammal eDNA signals were weaker and detected less frequently than semi-aquatic mammal eDNA signals. eDNA metabarcoding could enhance mammal monitoring through large-scale, multi-species distribution assessment for priority and difficult to survey species, and provide early indication of range expansions or contractions. However, eDNA surveys need high spatiotemporal resolution and metabarcoding biases require further investigation before routine implementation.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherElsevier BVen_UK
dc.relationHarper LR, Lawson Handley L, Carpenter AI, Ghazali M, Di Muri C, Macgregor CJ, Logan TW, Law A, Breithaupt T, Read DS, McDevitt AD & Hänfling B (2019) Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding of pond water as a tool to survey conservation and management priority mammals. Biological Conservation, 238, Art. No.: 108225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108225en_UK
dc.rightsThis item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study. Accepted refereed manuscript of: Harper LR, Lawson Handley L, Carpenter AI, Ghazali M, Di Muri C, Macgregor CJ, Logan TW, Law A, Breithaupt T, Read DS, McDevitt AD & Hänfling B (2019) Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding of pond water as a tool to survey conservation and management priority mammals. Biological Conservation, 238, Art. No.: 108225. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108225 © 2019, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectCamera trapsen_UK
dc.subjectField signsen_UK
dc.subjectLenticen_UK
dc.subjectMonitoringen_UK
dc.subjectSemi-aquatic mammalsen_UK
dc.subjectTerrestrial mammalsen_UK
dc.titleEnvironmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding of pond water as a tool to survey conservation and management priority mammalsen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2020-09-05en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108225en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleBiological Conservationen_UK
dc.citation.issn0006-3207en_UK
dc.citation.issn0006-3207en_UK
dc.citation.volume238en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusAM - Accepted Manuscripten_UK
dc.contributor.funderNatural Environment Research Councilen_UK
dc.contributor.funderUniversity of Hullen_UK
dc.author.emailalan.law1@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date04/09/2019en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Hullen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Hullen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationWildwood Trusten_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationEdinburgh Zooen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Hullen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Yorken_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Hullen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBiological and Environmental Sciencesen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Hullen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationCentre for Ecology & Hydrology (CEH)en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Salforden_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Hullen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000497252700027en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85071623930en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1443365en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-5971-3214en_UK
dc.date.accepted2019-08-26en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2019-08-26en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2019-09-17en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionAMen_UK
local.rioxx.authorHarper, Lynsey R|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorLawson Handley, Lori|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorCarpenter, Angus I|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorGhazali, Muhammad|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorDi Muri, Cristina|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMacgregor, Callum J|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorLogan, Thomas W|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorLaw, Alan|0000-0001-5971-3214en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBreithaupt, Thomas|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorRead, Daniel S|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMcDevitt, Allan D|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorHänfling, Bernd|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectNE/R016429/1|Natural Environment Research Council|http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000270en_UK
local.rioxx.projectProject ID unknown|University of Hull|en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2020-09-05en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||2020-09-04en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/|2020-09-05|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameHarper_et_al_acceptedmanuscript_12.08.19.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source0006-3207en_UK
Appears in Collections:Biological and Environmental Sciences Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Harper_et_al_acceptedmanuscript_12.08.19.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version1.38 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.