Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/29816
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKerrison, Robert Sen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMcGregor, Lesley Men_UK
dc.contributor.authorMarshall, Sarahen_UK
dc.contributor.authorIsitt, Johnen_UK
dc.contributor.authorCounsell, Nicholasen_UK
dc.contributor.authorRees, Colin Jen_UK
dc.contributor.authorvon Wagner, Christianen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-02T00:06:19Z-
dc.date.available2019-07-02T00:06:19Z-
dc.date.issued2017en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/29816-
dc.description.abstractBackground and study aims Uptake of flexible sigmoidoscopy screening in the English Bowel Scope Screening (BSS) Programme is low. The aim of this study was to test the impact of a nonparticipant reminder and theory-based leaflet to promote uptake among former nonresponders (previously did not confirm their appointment) and nonattenders (previously confirmed their appointment but did not attend). Patients and methods Eligible adults were men and women in London who had not attended a BSS appointment within 12 months of their invitation. Individuals were randomized (1:1:1) to receive no reminder (control), a 12-month reminder plus standard information booklet (TMR-SIB), or a 12-month reminder plus bespoke theory-based leaflet (TMR-TBL) designed to address barriers to screening. The primary outcome of the study was the proportion of individuals screened within each group 12 weeks after the delivery of the reminder. Results A total of 1383 men and women were randomized and analyzed as allocated (n = 461 per trial arm). Uptake was 0.2 % (n = 1), 10.4 % (n = 48), and 15.2 % (n = 70) in the control, TMR-SIB, and TMR-TBL groups, respectively. Individuals in the TMR-SIB and TMR-TBL groups were significantly more likely to attend screening than individuals in the control group (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 53.7, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 7.4 – 391.4, P en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherGeorg Thieme Verlagen_UK
dc.relationKerrison RS, McGregor LM, Marshall S, Isitt J, Counsell N, Rees CJ & von Wagner C (2017) Improving uptake of flexible sigmoidoscopy screening: a randomized trial of nonparticipant reminders in the English Screening Programme. Endoscopy, 49 (1), pp. 35-43. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-118452en_UK
dc.rightsThis article was published under a Creative Commons Attribution license (CC BY - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). You may freely read, download, print out and share, immediately and permanently.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_UK
dc.titleImproving uptake of flexible sigmoidoscopy screening: a randomized trial of nonparticipant reminders in the English Screening Programmeen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1055/s-0042-118452en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid27997965en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleEndoscopyen_UK
dc.citation.issn1438-8812en_UK
dc.citation.issn0013-726Xen_UK
dc.citation.volume49en_UK
dc.citation.issue1en_UK
dc.citation.spage35en_UK
dc.citation.epage43en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.contributor.funderUniversity College Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.funderCancer Research UKen_UK
dc.author.emaill.m.mcgregor@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date20/12/2016en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity College Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity College Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSt Mark's Hospital and Academic Instituteen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationResonant Behaviour Change and Social Marketingen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity College Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationDurham Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity College Londonen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000394243300006en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85007201931en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1399366en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-7093-1391en_UK
dc.date.accepted2016-08-29en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2016-08-29en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2019-06-28en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorKerrison, Robert S|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMcGregor, Lesley M|0000-0002-7093-1391en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMarshall, Sarah|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorIsitt, John|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorCounsell, Nicholas|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorRees, Colin J|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorvon Wagner, Christian|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectProject ID unknown|Cancer Research UK|http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000289en_UK
local.rioxx.projectProject ID unknown|University College London|http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000765en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2019-06-28en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2019-06-28|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenames-0042-118452.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source0013-726Xen_UK
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
s-0042-118452.pdfFulltext - Published Version730.37 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.