Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/29798
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Handling of missing outcome data in traumatic brain injury research: a systematic review
Author(s): Richter, Sophie
Stevenson, Susan
Newman, Tom
Wilson, Lindsay
Menon, David
Maas, Andrew
Nieboer, Daan
Lingsma, Hester
Steyerberg, Ewout W
Newcombe, Virginia
Issue Date: Oct-2019
Citation: Richter S, Stevenson S, Newman T, Wilson L, Menon D, Maas A, Nieboer D, Lingsma H, Steyerberg EW & Newcombe V (2019) Handling of missing outcome data in traumatic brain injury research: a systematic review. Journal of Neurotrauma, 36 (19), pp. 2743-2752. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2018.6216
Abstract: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) research commonly measures long-term functional outcome but studies often suffer from missing data as patients are lost to follow up. This review assesses the extent and handling of missing outcome data in the TBI literature, and provides a practical guide for future research. Relevant electronic databases were searched from January 1, 2012 to October 27, 2017 for TBI studies which used the Glasgow Outcome Scale or Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOS/GOSE) as an outcome measure. Studies were screened and data extracted in line with Cochrane guidance. A total of 195 studies, 21 interventional, 174 observational, with 104,688 patients were included. Using the reported follow-up rates in a mixed model, on average 91% of patients were predicted to return to follow up at 6 months post-injury, 84% at 1 year and 69% at 2 years. However, 36% of studies provided insufficient information to determine the number of subjects at each time point. Of 139 studies which did report missing outcome data, only 50% attempted to identify why data were missing, with just 4 reporting their assumption on the missingness mechanism. The handling of missing data was heterogeneous, with the most common method being its exclusion from analysis. These results confirm substantial variability in the standard of reporting and handling of missing outcome data in TBI research. We conclude that practical guidance is needed to facilitate meaningful and accurate study interpretation and therefore propose a framework for the handling of missing outcome data in future TBI research.
DOI Link: 10.1089/neu.2018.6216
Rights: Copyright Sophie Richter et al., 2019; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. This Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
Licence URL(s): http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
neu.2018.6216.pdfFulltext - Published Version4.29 MBAdobe PDFView/Open



This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.