Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/29746
Appears in Collections:Management, Work and Organisation Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Statistics and probability have always been value-laden: An historical ontology of quantitative research methods
Author(s): Zyphur, Michael
Pierides, Dean
Contact Email: d.c.pierides@stir.ac.uk
Keywords: Quantitative research methods
History Research ethics
Historical ontology
Statistics and probability
Rigor
Relevance
Best practices
Questionable research practices
Issue Date: Nov-2020
Citation: Zyphur M & Pierides D (2020) Statistics and probability have always been value-laden: An historical ontology of quantitative research methods. Journal of Business Ethics, 167 (1), pp. 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04187-8
Abstract: Quantitative researchers often discuss research ethics as if specific ethical problems can be reduced to abstract normative logics (e.g., virtue ethics, utilitarianism, deontology). Such approaches overlook how values are embedded in every aspect of quantitative methods, including ‘observations,’ ‘facts,’ and notions of ‘objectivity.’ We describe how quantitative research practices, concepts, discourses, and their objects/subjects of study have always been value-laden, from the invention of statistics and probability in the 1600s to their subsequent adoption as a logic made to appear as if it exists prior to, and separate from, ethics and values. This logic, which was embraced in the Academy of Management from the 1960s, casts management researchers as ethical agents who ought to know about a reality conceptualized as naturally existing in the image of statistics and probability (replete with ‘constructs’), while overlooking that S&P logic and practices, which researchers made for themselves, have an appreciable role in making the world appear this way. We introduce a different way to conceptualize reality and ethics, wherein the process of scientific inquiry itself requires an examination of its own practices and commitments. Instead of resorting to decontextualized notions of ‘rigor’ and its ‘best practices,’ quantitative researchers can adopt more purposeful ways to reason about the ethics and relevance of their methods and their science. We end by considering implications for addressing ‘post truth’ and ‘alternative facts’ problems as collective concerns, wherein it is actually the pluralistic nature of description that makes defending a collectively valuable version of reality so important and urgent.
DOI Link: 10.1007/s10551-019-04187-8
Rights: This item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study. This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in Journal of Business Ethics. The final authenticated version is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04187-8

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Zyphur M Pierides D. (accepted). Statistics and probability have always been value-laden.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version718.18 kBAdobe PDFView/Open



This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.