Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/29648
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorLivingstone, Andrew-
dc.contributor.advisorLee, Phyllis-
dc.contributor.authorJasper, Carol-
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-31T15:20:34Z-
dc.date.available2019-05-31T15:20:34Z-
dc.date.issued2019-02-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/29648-
dc.description.abstractABSTRACT This research aimed to examine how young people negotiate positive social value within an institution which continually stratifies them, and to consider the impact that category memberships such as social class and gender may have on the negotiation of value. Social value is negotiated by pupils in two key ways; amongst their peers and from the institution. The research took place within a Scottish comprehensive high school with a randomly assigned cohort of pupils. This setting was a particularly suitable one, because while the goal of modern secondary education in the UK is for all children to have an equal opportunity to learn (UK Government, 2018), 12.2% of pupils in the UK nevertheless leave school with no qualifications (OECD, 2018), and many others leave school feeling worthless (Whittaker 2008; 2010). Using a longitudinal, ethnographic method, the school careers of the pupils were closely observed for four years. A hybrid deductive and inductive data coding process was employed and the resulting analyses focussed upon four organising themes: institutional practices, socio-economic status, gender, and peer-on-peer recognition. The analysis within each theme integrates three levels of influence: the institution, the classroom, and individual pupil educational career trajectories. This range of analysis allows for the consideration of multi-layered perspectives, ranging from broad, institutionally-defined factors such as academic streaming, through classroom-level practices such as discipline, to fine-grained analyses of pupil experiences through detailed vignettes of observed behaviour. The research extends and informs current social psychological theories by analysing dynamic pupil responses in a naturalistic setting over an extended time period, in a manner that complements existing research traditionally using more static methods such as experiments and surveys. Taken together, the analyses demonstrate the pivotal role of the institution in determining social value systems of recognition and, critically, the educational outcomes of some of the most vulnerable pupils. Keywords: value, institution, socio-economic, gender, ostracism, recognition,en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherUniversity of Stirlingen_GB
dc.subjectvalueen_GB
dc.subjectinstitutionen_GB
dc.subjectsocio-economicen_GB
dc.subjectgenderen_GB
dc.subjectostracismen_GB
dc.subjectrecognitionen_GB
dc.subject.lcshEducation Scotlanden_GB
dc.subject.lcshEducation, Secondary Scotland.en_GB
dc.subject.lcshEducational sociologyen_GB
dc.subject.lcshSex differences in educationen_GB
dc.subject.lcshInclusive educationen_GB
dc.titleLeft out until they drop out: how young people negotiate social value in schoolen_GB
dc.typeThesis or Dissertationen_GB
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen_GB
dc.type.qualificationnameDoctor of Philosophyen_GB
dc.contributor.funderEconomic Social Research Councilen_GB
dc.author.emailcarol.jasper@stir.ac.uken_GB
Appears in Collections:Psychology eTheses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Formatted Print Version - Final.pdf2.1 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.