Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/29597
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAllen, Carolineen_UK
dc.contributor.authorHavlicek, Janen_UK
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, Kateen_UK
dc.contributor.authorRoberts, S Craigen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-29T13:26:02Z-
dc.date.available2019-05-29T13:26:02Z-
dc.date.issued2019-10-15en_UK
dc.identifier.other112541en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/29597-
dc.description.abstractThere is substantial evidence for assortative partner preferences in humans based on physical characteristics. In contrast, evidence suggests that olfactory preferences tend to be disassortative, with people preferring body odour of potential partners who are dissimilar at key genetic loci, perhaps to gain fitness advantage through offspring heterozygosity. We compared ratings of perceived body odour similarity of real couples with those of randomly paired ‘fake’ couples. Contrary to prediction, we find that odours of real partners are perceived more, rather than less, similar to each other than fake couples. However, this applied only to natural odour samples: there were no differences in similarity levels of real and fake couples' samples which were collected while wearing artificial fragrances. Furthermore, in light of suggestions that hormonal contraception (HC) disrupts disassortative odour preferences in women, we compared odour similarity among real couples in which the female partner was using or not using HC at the time when the relationship began. We find that odours of HC-using couples are of intermediate similarity between non-using and fake couples, suggesting that HC use during partner choice could affect odour-influenced assortment. We also examined the association between relationship satisfaction and perceived similarity of unfragranced odours of real couples. We found that these are positively correlated in male partners but negatively correlated in the female partners, indicative of a sex difference in the relative favourability of odour similarity in partner preference. Finally, by comparing odour similarity ratings with those given by perfumers using a novel olfactory lexicon we found evidence that similarity judgements were based on the Spicy/Animalic aspects of individual odour profiles. Taken together, our results challenge the conventional view that odour-mediated partner preferences in humans are typically disassortative.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherElsevieren_UK
dc.relationAllen C, Havlicek J, Williams K & Roberts SC (2019) Evidence for odour-mediated assortative mating in humans: The impact of hormonal contraception and artificial fragrances. Physiology and Behavior, 210, Art. No.: 112541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2019.05.002en_UK
dc.rightsThis item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study. Accepted refereed manuscript of: Allen C, Havlicek J, Williams K & Roberts SC (2019) Evidence for odour-mediated assortative mating in humans: The impact of hormonal contraception and artificial fragrances. Physiology and Behavior, 210, Art. No.: 112541. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2019.05.002 © 2019, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectHomogamyen_UK
dc.subjectFragranceen_UK
dc.subjectHormonal contraceptionen_UK
dc.subjectAssortative matingen_UK
dc.subjectBody odouren_UK
dc.subjectOlfactionen_UK
dc.titleEvidence for odour-mediated assortative mating in humans: The impact of hormonal contraception and artificial fragrancesen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2020-05-16en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[FinalSubmittedVersion.pdf] Publisher requires embargo of 12 months after formal publication.en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.physbeh.2019.05.002en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid31103136en_UK
dc.citation.jtitlePhysiology and Behavioren_UK
dc.citation.issn1873-507Xen_UK
dc.citation.issn0031-9384en_UK
dc.citation.volume210en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusAM - Accepted Manuscripten_UK
dc.author.emailcraig.roberts@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date15/05/2019en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPsychologyen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationCharles University in Pragueen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUnilever UK Ltden_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPsychologyen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000488654900027en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85065577155en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1380288en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-9641-6101en_UK
dc.date.accepted2019-05-05en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2019-05-05en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2019-05-29en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionAMen_UK
local.rioxx.authorAllen, Caroline|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorHavlicek, Jan|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorWilliams, Kate|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorRoberts, S Craig|0000-0002-9641-6101en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2020-05-16en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||2020-05-15en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/|2020-05-16|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameFinalSubmittedVersion.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1873-507Xen_UK
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FinalSubmittedVersion.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version681.6 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.