Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/29438
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorUny, Isabelleen_UK
dc.contributor.authorde Kok, Bregjeen_UK
dc.contributor.authorFustukian, Suzanneen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-07T00:13:09Z-
dc.date.available2019-05-07T00:13:09Z-
dc.date.issued2019-04-01en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/29438-
dc.description.abstractTo address its persistently high maternal mortality, the Malawi government has prioritised strategies promoting skilled birth attendance and institutional delivery. However, in a country where 80% of the population resides in rural areas, the barriers to institutional deliveries are considerable. As a response, Malawi issued Community Guidelines in 2007 that both promoted skilled birth attendance and banned the utilization of traditional birth attendants for routine deliveries. This grounded theory study used interviews and focus groups to explore community actors’ perceptions regarding the implementation of this policy and the related affects that arose from its implementation. The results revealed the complexity of decisionmaking and delivery care-seeking behaviours in rural areas of Malawi in the context of this policy. Although women and other actors seemed to agree that institutional deliveries were safer when complications occurred, this did not necessarily ensure their compliance. Furthermore, implementation of the 2007 Community Policy aggravated some of the barriers women already faced. This innovative bottom-up analysis of policy implementation showed that the policy had further ruptured linkages between community and health facilities, which was ultimately detrimental to the continuum of care. This study helps fill an important gap in research concerning maternal health policy implementation in LICs, by focusing on the perceptions of those at the receiving end of policy change. It highlights the need for globally promoted policies and strategies to take better account of local realities.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherOxford University Pressen_UK
dc.relationUny I, de Kok B & Fustukian S (2019) Weighing the options for delivery care in rural Malawi: community perceptions of a policy promoting exclusive skilled birth attendance and banning traditional birth attendants. Health Policy and Planning, 34 (3), pp. 161-169. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czz020en_UK
dc.rightsThis item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study. This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in Health Policy and Planning following peer review. The version of record Uny I, de Kok B & Fustukian S (2019) Weighing the options for delivery care in rural Malawi: community perceptions of a policy promoting exclusive skilled birth attendance and banning traditional birth attendants. Health Policy and Planning, 34 (3), pp. 161-169 is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czz020en_UK
dc.subjectPolicy analysisen_UK
dc.subjectpolicy implementationen_UK
dc.subjectmaternal healthen_UK
dc.subjectMalawien_UK
dc.subjecttraditional birth attendantsen_UK
dc.subjectrural healthen_UK
dc.subjectcommunity careen_UK
dc.subjectskilled birth attendanceen_UK
dc.subjectchildbirthen_UK
dc.titleWeighing the options for delivery care in rural Malawi: community perceptions of a policy promoting exclusive skilled birth attendance and banning traditional birth attendantsen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2020-04-02en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[IU re-submission PhD paper_system_appendPDF_proof_hi030119.pdf] Publisher requires embargo of 12 months after formal publication.en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/heapol/czz020en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid30941399en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleHealth Policy and Planningen_UK
dc.citation.issn1460-2237en_UK
dc.citation.issn0268-1080en_UK
dc.citation.volume34en_UK
dc.citation.issue3en_UK
dc.citation.spage161en_UK
dc.citation.epage169en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusAM - Accepted Manuscripten_UK
dc.author.emailisabelle.uny@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date02/04/2019en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationInstitute for Social Marketingen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Amsterdamen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationQueen Margaret Universityen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000469769700001en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85066456310en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1241328en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-9548-5332en_UK
dc.date.accepted2019-02-28en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2019-02-28en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2019-05-06en_UK
dc.subject.tagBehaviour changeen_UK
dc.subject.tagEmotional well-being of womenen_UK
dc.subject.tagMaternityen_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionAMen_UK
local.rioxx.authorUny, Isabelle|0000-0002-9548-5332en_UK
local.rioxx.authorde Kok, Bregje|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorFustukian, Suzanne|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2020-04-02en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||2020-04-01en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved|2020-04-02|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameIU re-submission PhD paper_system_appendPDF_proof_hi030119.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1460-2237en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
IU re-submission PhD paper_system_appendPDF_proof_hi030119.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version417.1 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.