Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/29413
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Social Sciences Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: The Healthcare Conflict Scale: development, validation and reliability testing of a tool for use across clinical settings
Author(s): Forbat, Liz
Mnatzaganian, George
Barclay, Sarah
Contact Email: elizabeth.forbat1@stir.ac.uk
Keywords: Conflict
construct validity
health services research
principal component analysis
reliability
tool
Issue Date: 2019
Date Deposited: 25-Apr-2019
Citation: Forbat L, Mnatzaganian G & Barclay S (2019) The Healthcare Conflict Scale: development, validation and reliability testing of a tool for use across clinical settings. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 33 (6), pp. 680-688. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2019.1593117
Abstract: Despite the widespread incidence of conflict and its detrimental impact across a range of health-care settings, there is no validated tool with which to measure it. This paper describes the international innovation of a tool to measure staff-family conflict in pediatrics, intensive care, emergency, palliative care, and nursing homes. Sixty-two health-care workers contributed to focus group discussions to refine a draft tool developed from the literature. Subsequently, 101 health-care workers applied the tool to fictionalized vignettes. The psychometric properties (construct validity, internal consistency, repeatability, and reliability) were explored using principal component analysis, Cronbach’s alpha, and intra-class correlation (ICC) tests. The initial 17-item tool was reduced to seven items within three factors that explained 70.2% of the total variance in overarching construct. The internal consistency of the final overall scale was good (Cronbach’s alpha: 0.750); test–retest reliability of each item was excellent with ICCs ≥0.9. This new tool can be used to identify and score conflict, making it a key reference point in healthcare conflict work across clinical specialties. It's development and testing across specialities and across countries means it can be used in a variety of contexts. The tool provides health-care professionals with a new way to identify and measure conflict, and consequently has the potential to transform health-care relationships across disciplines and settings.
DOI Link: 10.1080/13561820.2019.1593117
Rights: This item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study. This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis Group in Journal of Interprofessional Care on 21 Apr 2019 available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/13561820.2019.1593117.

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Conflict paper_FOR STORRE.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version939.84 kBAdobe PDFView/Open



This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.