Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/29413
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorForbat, Lizen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMnatzaganian, Georgeen_UK
dc.contributor.authorBarclay, Sarahen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-03T00:03:35Z-
dc.date.available2019-05-03T00:03:35Z-
dc.date.issued2019en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/29413-
dc.description.abstractDespite the widespread incidence of conflict and its detrimental impact across a range of health-care settings, there is no validated tool with which to measure it. This paper describes the international innovation of a tool to measure staff-family conflict in pediatrics, intensive care, emergency, palliative care, and nursing homes. Sixty-two health-care workers contributed to focus group discussions to refine a draft tool developed from the literature. Subsequently, 101 health-care workers applied the tool to fictionalized vignettes. The psychometric properties (construct validity, internal consistency, repeatability, and reliability) were explored using principal component analysis, Cronbach’s alpha, and intra-class correlation (ICC) tests. The initial 17-item tool was reduced to seven items within three factors that explained 70.2% of the total variance in overarching construct. The internal consistency of the final overall scale was good (Cronbach’s alpha: 0.750); test–retest reliability of each item was excellent with ICCs ≥0.9. This new tool can be used to identify and score conflict, making it a key reference point in healthcare conflict work across clinical specialties. It's development and testing across specialities and across countries means it can be used in a variety of contexts. The tool provides health-care professionals with a new way to identify and measure conflict, and consequently has the potential to transform health-care relationships across disciplines and settings.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherInforma UK Limiteden_UK
dc.relationForbat L, Mnatzaganian G & Barclay S (2019) The Healthcare Conflict Scale: development, validation and reliability testing of a tool for use across clinical settings. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 33 (6), pp. 680-688. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2019.1593117en_UK
dc.rightsThis item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study. This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis Group in Journal of Interprofessional Care on 21 Apr 2019 available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/13561820.2019.1593117.en_UK
dc.subjectConflicten_UK
dc.subjectconstruct validityen_UK
dc.subjecthealth services researchen_UK
dc.subjectprincipal component analysisen_UK
dc.subjectreliabilityen_UK
dc.subjecttoolen_UK
dc.titleThe Healthcare Conflict Scale: development, validation and reliability testing of a tool for use across clinical settingsen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2020-04-22en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[Conflict paper_FOR STORRE.pdf] Publisher requires embargo of 12 months after formal publication.en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/13561820.2019.1593117en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid31006290en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleJournal of Interprofessional Careen_UK
dc.citation.issn1469-9567en_UK
dc.citation.issn1356-1820en_UK
dc.citation.volume33en_UK
dc.citation.issue6en_UK
dc.citation.spage680en_UK
dc.citation.epage688en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusAM - Accepted Manuscripten_UK
dc.contributor.funderAardvark TMCen_UK
dc.author.emailelizabeth.forbat1@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date21/04/2019en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationFaculty of Social Sciencesen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationLa Trobe Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationMedical Mediation Foundationen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000470590900001en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85064675455en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1273934en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-7218-5775en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-7698-5091en_UK
dc.date.accepted2019-02-25en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2019-02-25en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2019-04-25en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionAMen_UK
local.rioxx.authorForbat, Liz|0000-0002-7218-5775en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMnatzaganian, George|0000-0002-7698-5091en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBarclay, Sarah|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectProject ID unknown|Aardvark TMC|en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2020-04-22en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||2020-04-21en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved|2020-04-22|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameConflict paper_FOR STORRE.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1469-9567en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Social Sciences Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Conflict paper_FOR STORRE.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version939.84 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.