Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/29315
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDoyle, Franken_UK
dc.contributor.authorMorgan, Karenen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMathew, Maryen_UK
dc.contributor.authorPalatty, Princyen_UK
dc.contributor.authorKamat, Prashantien_UK
dc.contributor.authorDoherty, Sallyen_UK
dc.contributor.authorQuigley, Jodyen_UK
dc.contributor.authorHenderson, Joshen_UK
dc.contributor.authorO’Carroll, Ronanen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-13T00:01:49Z-
dc.date.available2019-04-13T00:01:49Z-
dc.date.issued2019-04-11en_UK
dc.identifier.other1304en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/29315-
dc.description.abstractEliciting different attitudes with survey questionnaires may impact on intention to donate organs. Previous research used varying numbers of questionnaire items, or different modes of intervention delivery, when comparing groups. We aimed to determine whether intention to donate organs differed among groups exposed to different theoretical content, but similar questionnaire length, in different countries. We tested the effect of excluding affective attitudinal items on intention to donate, using constant item numbers in two modes of intervention delivery. Study 1: A multi-country, interviewer-led, cross-sectional randomized trial recruited 1007 participants, who completed questionnaires as per group assignment: including all affective attitude items, affective attitude items replaced, negatively-worded affective attitude items replaced. Study 2 recruited a UK-representative, cross-sectional sample of 616 participants using an online methodology, randomly assigned to the same conditions. Multilevel models assessed effects of group membership on outcomes: intention to donate (primary), taking a donor card, following a web-link (secondary). In study 1, intention to donate did not differ among groups. Study 2 found a small, significantly higher intention to donate in the negatively-worded affective attitudes replaced group. Combining data yielded no group differences. No differences were seen for secondary outcomes. Ancillary analyses suggest significant interviewer effects. Contrary to previous research, theoretical content may be less relevant than number or valence of questionnaire items, or form of intervention delivery, for increasing intention to donate organs.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherMDPI AGen_UK
dc.relationDoyle F, Morgan K, Mathew M, Palatty P, Kamat P, Doherty S, Quigley J, Henderson J & O’Carroll R (2019) Theory Content, Question-Behavior Effects, or Form of Delivery Effects for Intention to Become an Organ Donor? Two Randomized Trials. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16 (7), Art. No.: 1304. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16071304en_UK
dc.rightsThis is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).en_UK
dc.subjectorgan donationen_UK
dc.subjectaffective attitudesen_UK
dc.subjectquestion-behavior effecten_UK
dc.subjectrandomized trialen_UK
dc.subjectpsychological theoryen_UK
dc.subjectpublic healthen_UK
dc.titleTheory Content, Question-Behavior Effects, or Form of Delivery Effects for Intention to Become an Organ Donor? Two Randomized Trialsen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/ijerph16071304en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid30979026en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Healthen_UK
dc.citation.issn1660-4601en_UK
dc.citation.volume16en_UK
dc.citation.issue7en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.contributor.funderRCSI Research Summer School and the RCSI Student Selected Componenten_UK
dc.citation.date11/04/2019en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationRoyal College of Surgeons (Ireland)en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationRoyal College of Surgeons (Ireland)en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationManipal Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationFather Muller Medical Collegeen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationManipal Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationRoyal College of Surgeons (Ireland)en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPsychologyen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPsychologyen_UK
dc.identifier.isi000465595800217en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1269081en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-8289-3145en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-5130-291Xen_UK
dc.date.accepted2019-04-09en_UK
dc.description.refREF Compliant by Deposit in Stirling's Repositoryen_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2019-04-12en_UK
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
ijerph-16-01304-1.pdfFulltext - Published Version596.39 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.