Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/29283
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMoodie, Crawforden_UK
dc.contributor.authorBrose, Leonieen_UK
dc.contributor.authorLee, Hyunen_UK
dc.contributor.authorPower, Emilyen_UK
dc.contributor.authorBauld, Lindaen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-11T00:03:08Z-
dc.date.available2019-04-11T00:03:08Z-
dc.date.issued2020en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/29283-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: In the United Kingdom, standardised packaging for cigarettes was phased in between May 2016 and May 2017. We assessed whether there was an association between using standardised packs and warning salience, thoughts about the risks of smoking, thoughts about quitting, and awareness and use of stop-smoking websites. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional online survey with current smokers aged 16 and over (N = 1865) recruited in two regions of England between February-April 2017, when both standardised and fully-branded packs were on the market. Participants were asked about use of standardised packs, warning salience (noticing, reading closely), and whether the packs they were using increased thoughts of the risks of smoking and quitting. They were also asked about awareness of stop-smoking websites, source of awareness (including warnings on packs), and whether they had visited a stop-smoking website. Results: Most participants reported currently using standardised packs (76.4%), 9.3% were not currently using them but had previously used them, and 14.3% had never used them. Compared with never users, current users were more likely to have noticed the warnings on packs often/very often (AOR (95%CI) = 2.76 (2.10, 3.63)), read them closely often/very often (AOR(95%CI) = 2.16 (1.51, 3.10)), thought somewhat/a lot about the health risks of smoking (AOR(95%CI) = 1.92 (1.38, 2.68)), and thought somewhat/a lot about quitting (AOR(95%CI) = 1.90 (1.30, 2.77)). They were also more likely to have noticed a stop-smoking website on packs. Conclusions: Consistent with the broad objectives of standardised packaging, we found that it was associated with increased warning salience and thoughts about risks and quittingen_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen_UK
dc.relationMoodie C, Brose L, Lee H, Power E & Bauld L (2020) How did smokers respond to standardised cigarette packaging with new, larger health warnings in the United Kingdom during the transition period? A cross-sectional online survey. Addiction Research and Theory, 28 (1), pp. 53-61. https://doi.org/10.1080/16066359.2019.1579803en_UK
dc.rights© 2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectTobaccoen_UK
dc.subjectpackaging and labellingen_UK
dc.subjectpublic policyen_UK
dc.titleHow did smokers respond to standardised cigarette packaging with new, larger health warnings in the United Kingdom during the transition period? A cross-sectional online surveyen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/16066359.2019.1579803en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid31992964en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleAddiction Research and Theoryen_UK
dc.citation.issn1476-7392en_UK
dc.citation.issn1606-6359en_UK
dc.citation.volume28en_UK
dc.citation.issue1en_UK
dc.citation.spage53en_UK
dc.citation.epage61en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.contributor.funderCancer Research UKen_UK
dc.citation.date19/03/2019en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationInstitute for Social Marketingen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationKing's College Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationKing's College Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationCancer Research UKen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Edinburghen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000463280700001en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85063073801en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1265938en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-1805-2509en_UK
dc.date.accepted2019-02-04en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2019-02-04en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2019-04-09en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorMoodie, Crawford|0000-0002-1805-2509en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBrose, Leonie|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorLee, Hyun|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorPower, Emily|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBauld, Linda|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectProject ID unknown|Cancer Research UK|http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000289en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2019-04-09en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2019-04-09|en_UK
local.rioxx.filename16066359.2019.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1476-7392en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles



This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.