Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/29282
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPollard, Chrisen_UK
dc.contributor.authorRedpath, Steveen_UK
dc.contributor.authorBussière, Lucen_UK
dc.contributor.authorKeane, Aidanen_UK
dc.contributor.authorThompson, Desen_UK
dc.contributor.authorYoung, Julietteen_UK
dc.contributor.authorBunnefeld, Nilsen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-11T00:02:41Z-
dc.date.available2019-04-11T00:02:41Z-
dc.date.issued2019-05en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/29282-
dc.description.abstractStakeholder cooperation can be vital in managing conservation conflicts. Laboratory experiments show cooperation is less likely in the presence of uncertainty. Much less is known about how stakeholders in real-life conservation conflicts respond to different types of uncertainty. We tested the effects of different sources of uncertainty on cooperative behaviour using a framed field experiment and interviews. The experiment compared a baseline scenario of perfect certainty with scenarios including either: (a) scientific uncertainty about the effectiveness of a conflict-reduction intervention; (b) administrative uncertainty about intervention funding; or (c) political uncertainty about the extent of community support. We applied these scenarios to a conservation conflict in the Outer Hebrides, Scotland, involving the management of geese to simultaneously meet both conservation and farming objectives. We asked 149 crofters (small-scale farmers) if they would commit to cooperate with others by helping fund a goose management plan given the three sources of uncertainty. On average, intention to cooperate was highest (99%) in scenarios without uncertainty, and lowest under administrative uncertainty (77%). Scientific uncertainty and political uncertainty both had less of an effect, with over 95% of crofters predicted to be willing to cooperate in these scenarios. Crofters who indicated concern for other crofters suffering the impact of geese were more likely to cooperate. The longer an individual had been a crofter, the less likely they were to cooperate. Synthesis and applications. Crofters’ intention to cooperate is high but lessened by uncertainty, especially over the commitment from other stakeholders such as government, to cooperate on goose management. Existing cooperation on goose management may be at risk if uncertainty is not reduced outright or commitments between parties are not strengthened. This has wide applicability, supporting the need for researchers and government advisers to: (a) determine how uncertainty will impact intention of stakeholders to cooperate; and (b) take steps (such as uncertainty reduction, communication or acceptance) to reduce the negative impact of uncertainty on cooperation.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherWileyen_UK
dc.relationPollard C, Redpath S, Bussière L, Keane A, Thompson D, Young J & Bunnefeld N (2019) The impact of uncertainty on cooperation intent in a conservation conflict. Journal of Applied Ecology, 56 (5), pp. 1278-1288. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13361en_UK
dc.rightsThis is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Applied Ecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Ecological Societyen_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectconflicten_UK
dc.subjectconservation managementen_UK
dc.subjectdecision‐makingen_UK
dc.subjectexperimental economicsen_UK
dc.subjectgooseen_UK
dc.subjectpublic goods gameen_UK
dc.subjectuncertaintyen_UK
dc.titleThe impact of uncertainty on cooperation intent in a conservation conflicten_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/1365-2664.13361en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleJournal of Applied Ecologyen_UK
dc.citation.issn1365-2664en_UK
dc.citation.issn0021-8901en_UK
dc.citation.volume56en_UK
dc.citation.issue5en_UK
dc.citation.spage1278en_UK
dc.citation.epage1288en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.contributor.funderNatural Environment Research Councilen_UK
dc.citation.date15/02/2019en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBiological and Environmental Sciencesen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Aberdeenen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBiological and Environmental Sciencesen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Edinburghen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationScottish Natural Heritageen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationCEH Edinburghen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBiological and Environmental Sciencesen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000471343200022en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85063006567en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1265945en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-8937-8381en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-1349-4463en_UK
dc.date.accepted2018-12-15en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2018-12-15en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2019-04-09en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorPollard, Chris|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorRedpath, Steve|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBussière, Luc|0000-0001-8937-8381en_UK
local.rioxx.authorKeane, Aidan|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorThompson, Des|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorYoung, Juliette|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBunnefeld, Nils|0000-0002-1349-4463en_UK
local.rioxx.projectProject ID unknown|Natural Environment Research Council|http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000270en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2019-04-09en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2019-04-09|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenamePollard_et_al-2019-Journal_of_Applied_Ecology.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1365-2664en_UK
Appears in Collections:Biological and Environmental Sciences Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Pollard_et_al-2019-Journal_of_Applied_Ecology.pdfFulltext - Published Version713.54 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.