Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/29058
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYoung, Juliette Cen_UK
dc.contributor.authorJordan, Andrewen_UK
dc.contributor.authorSearle, Kate Ren_UK
dc.contributor.authorButler, Adamen_UK
dc.contributor.authorChapman, Daniel Sen_UK
dc.contributor.authorSimmons, Peteren_UK
dc.contributor.authorWatt, Allan Den_UK
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-21T01:04:21Z-
dc.date.available2019-03-21T01:04:21Z-
dc.date.issued2013-02en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/29058-
dc.description.abstractThe establishment of protected areas, such as Natura 2000, is a common approach to curbing biodiversity loss. But many of these areas are owned or managed by private actors. Policies indicate that their involvement should be encouraged to ensure long term success. However, to date there have been no systematic evaluations of whether local actor involvement in the management of protected areas does in fact contribute to the conservation of biodiversity, which is the expressed policy goal. Research incorporating both qualitative and quantitative data was carried out in three case studies in Scotland where local actor input was required in the development and/or implementation of Natura 2000 management plans. No relationship was found between the characteristics of the process of stakeholder involvement and stakeholders’ perceptions of future biodiversity outcomes. Social outcomes of increased stakeholder involvement, such as increased trust, did however increase the perceived likelihood of positive future biodiversity outcomes. The findings indicate that efforts aimed at increasing stakeholder involvement in the management of protected areas need to consider making processes more independent, and acknowledge and address underlying biodiversity conflicts. The findings also emphasise the need to evaluate multi-level conservation efforts in terms of processes, social outcomes and biodiversity outcomes.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherElsevieren_UK
dc.relationYoung JC, Jordan A, Searle KR, Butler A, Chapman DS, Simmons P & Watt AD (2013) Does stakeholder involvement really benefit biodiversity conservation?. Biological Conservation, 158, pp. 359-370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2012.08.018en_UK
dc.rightsThe publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserveden_UK
dc.subjectBiodiversity conflicten_UK
dc.subjectNatura 2000en_UK
dc.subjectPublic participationen_UK
dc.subjectScotlanden_UK
dc.subjectSpecial Area of Conservationen_UK
dc.subjectStakeholder involvementen_UK
dc.titleDoes stakeholder involvement really benefit biodiversity conservation?en_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2999-12-31en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[Does stakeholder involvement really benefit biodiversity conservation.pdf] The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository therefore there is an embargo on the full text of the work.en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.biocon.2012.08.018en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleBiological Conservationen_UK
dc.citation.issn0006-3207en_UK
dc.citation.volume158en_UK
dc.citation.spage359en_UK
dc.citation.epage370en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.contributor.funderNatural Environment Research Councilen_UK
dc.author.emaildaniel.chapman@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date11/12/2012en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationCentre for Ecology & Hydrology (CEH)en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of East Angliaen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationCentre for Ecology & Hydrology (CEH)en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBiomathematics & Statistics Scotlanden_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationCentre for Ecology & Hydrologyen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of East Angliaen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationCentre for Ecology & Hydrology (CEH)en_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000318128300040en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84870903695en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1100280en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-1836-4112en_UK
dc.date.accepted2012-08-10en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2012-08-10en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2019-03-07en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorYoung, Juliette C|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorJordan, Andrew|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorSearle, Kate R|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorButler, Adam|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorChapman, Daniel S|0000-0003-1836-4112en_UK
local.rioxx.authorSimmons, Peter|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorWatt, Allan D|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectProject ID unknown|Natural Environment Research Council|http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000270en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2262-11-12en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameDoes stakeholder involvement really benefit biodiversity conservation.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source0006-3207en_UK
Appears in Collections:Biological and Environmental Sciences Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Does stakeholder involvement really benefit biodiversity conservation.pdfFulltext - Published Version549.08 kBAdobe PDFUnder Permanent Embargo    Request a copy


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.