Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1893/29058
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Young, Juliette C | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Jordan, Andrew | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Searle, Kate R | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Butler, Adam | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Chapman, Daniel S | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Simmons, Peter | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Watt, Allan D | en_UK |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-03-21T01:04:21Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-03-21T01:04:21Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2013-02 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1893/29058 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The establishment of protected areas, such as Natura 2000, is a common approach to curbing biodiversity loss. But many of these areas are owned or managed by private actors. Policies indicate that their involvement should be encouraged to ensure long term success. However, to date there have been no systematic evaluations of whether local actor involvement in the management of protected areas does in fact contribute to the conservation of biodiversity, which is the expressed policy goal. Research incorporating both qualitative and quantitative data was carried out in three case studies in Scotland where local actor input was required in the development and/or implementation of Natura 2000 management plans. No relationship was found between the characteristics of the process of stakeholder involvement and stakeholders’ perceptions of future biodiversity outcomes. Social outcomes of increased stakeholder involvement, such as increased trust, did however increase the perceived likelihood of positive future biodiversity outcomes. The findings indicate that efforts aimed at increasing stakeholder involvement in the management of protected areas need to consider making processes more independent, and acknowledge and address underlying biodiversity conflicts. The findings also emphasise the need to evaluate multi-level conservation efforts in terms of processes, social outcomes and biodiversity outcomes. | en_UK |
dc.language.iso | en | en_UK |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | en_UK |
dc.relation | Young JC, Jordan A, Searle KR, Butler A, Chapman DS, Simmons P & Watt AD (2013) Does stakeholder involvement really benefit biodiversity conservation?. Biological Conservation, 158, pp. 359-370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2012.08.018 | en_UK |
dc.rights | The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study. | en_UK |
dc.rights.uri | http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved | en_UK |
dc.subject | Biodiversity conflict | en_UK |
dc.subject | Natura 2000 | en_UK |
dc.subject | Public participation | en_UK |
dc.subject | Scotland | en_UK |
dc.subject | Special Area of Conservation | en_UK |
dc.subject | Stakeholder involvement | en_UK |
dc.title | Does stakeholder involvement really benefit biodiversity conservation? | en_UK |
dc.type | Journal Article | en_UK |
dc.rights.embargodate | 2999-12-31 | en_UK |
dc.rights.embargoreason | [Does stakeholder involvement really benefit biodiversity conservation.pdf] The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository therefore there is an embargo on the full text of the work. | en_UK |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.biocon.2012.08.018 | en_UK |
dc.citation.jtitle | Biological Conservation | en_UK |
dc.citation.issn | 0006-3207 | en_UK |
dc.citation.volume | 158 | en_UK |
dc.citation.spage | 359 | en_UK |
dc.citation.epage | 370 | en_UK |
dc.citation.publicationstatus | Published | en_UK |
dc.citation.peerreviewed | Refereed | en_UK |
dc.type.status | VoR - Version of Record | en_UK |
dc.contributor.funder | Natural Environment Research Council | en_UK |
dc.author.email | daniel.chapman@stir.ac.uk | en_UK |
dc.citation.date | 11/12/2012 | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Centre for Ecology & Hydrology (CEH) | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | University of East Anglia | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Centre for Ecology & Hydrology (CEH) | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Biomathematics & Statistics Scotland | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Centre for Ecology & Hydrology | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | University of East Anglia | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Centre for Ecology & Hydrology (CEH) | en_UK |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000318128300040 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-84870903695 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.wtid | 1100280 | en_UK |
dc.contributor.orcid | 0000-0003-1836-4112 | en_UK |
dc.date.accepted | 2012-08-10 | en_UK |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2012-08-10 | en_UK |
dc.date.filedepositdate | 2019-03-07 | en_UK |
rioxxterms.apc | not required | en_UK |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_UK |
rioxxterms.version | VoR | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Young, Juliette C| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Jordan, Andrew| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Searle, Kate R| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Butler, Adam| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Chapman, Daniel S|0000-0003-1836-4112 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Simmons, Peter| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Watt, Allan D| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.project | Project ID unknown|Natural Environment Research Council|http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000270 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate | 2262-11-12 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.licence | http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved|| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.filename | Does stakeholder involvement really benefit biodiversity conservation.pdf | en_UK |
local.rioxx.filecount | 1 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.source | 0006-3207 | en_UK |
Appears in Collections: | Biological and Environmental Sciences Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Does stakeholder involvement really benefit biodiversity conservation.pdf | Fulltext - Published Version | 549.08 kB | Adobe PDF | Under Permanent Embargo Request a copy |
This item is protected by original copyright |
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.