Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/28877
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorStower, Rebecca Een_UK
dc.contributor.authorLee, Anthony Jen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMcIntosh, Toneya Len_UK
dc.contributor.authorSidari, Morgan Jen_UK
dc.contributor.authorSherlock, James Men_UK
dc.contributor.authorDixson, Barnaby J Wen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-02T01:03:07Z-
dc.date.available2019-03-02T01:03:07Z-
dc.date.issued2020-04en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/28877-
dc.description.abstractAccording to the dual mating strategy model, in short-term mating contexts women should forego paternal investment qualities in favor of mates with well-developed secondary sexual characteristics and dominant behavioral displays. We tested whether this model explains variation in women’s preferences for facial masculinity and beardedness in male faces. Computer-generated composites that had been morphed to appear +/-50% masculine were rated by 671 heterosexual women (M age = 31.72 years, SD = 6.43) for attractiveness when considering them as a short-term partner, long-term partner, a co-parent or a friend. They then completed the Revised Sociosexual Inventory (SOI-R) to determine their sexual openness on dimensions of desire, behavior, and attitudes. Results showed that women’s preferences were strongest for average facial masculinity, followed by masculinized faces, with feminized faces being least attractive. In contrast to past research, facial masculinity preferences were stronger when judging for co-parenting partners than for short-term mates. Facial masculinity preferences were also positively associated with behavioral SOI, negatively with desire, and were unrelated to global or attitudinal SOI. Women gave higher ratings for full beards than clean-shaven faces. Preferences for beards were higher for co-parenting and long-term relationships than short-term relationships, although these differences were not statistically significant. Preferences for facial hair were positively associated with global and attitudinal SOI, but were unrelated to behavioral SOI and desire. Although further replication is necessary, our findings indicate that sexual openness is associated with women’s preferences for men’s facial hair and suggest variation in the association between sociosexuality and women’s facial masculinity preferences.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherBMCen_UK
dc.relationStower RE, Lee AJ, McIntosh TL, Sidari MJ, Sherlock JM & Dixson BJW (2020) Mating strategies and the masculinity paradox: How relationship context, relationship status, and sociosexuality shape women's preferences for facial masculinity and beardedness. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 49, p. 809–820. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-019-1437-2en_UK
dc.rightsThis item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study. This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in Archives of Sexual Behavior. The final authenticated version is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-019-1437-2en_UK
dc.subjectFacial attractivenessen_UK
dc.subjectMasculinityen_UK
dc.subjectFacial hairen_UK
dc.subjectSociosexualityen_UK
dc.titleMating strategies and the masculinity paradox: How relationship context, relationship status, and sociosexuality shape women's preferences for facial masculinity and beardednessen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2020-04-24en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[Manuscript-3.pdf] Publisher requires embargo of 12 months after formal publication.en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10508-019-1437-2en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid31016490en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleArchives of Sexual Behavioren_UK
dc.citation.issn1573-2800en_UK
dc.citation.issn0004-0002en_UK
dc.citation.volume49en_UK
dc.citation.spage809en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusAM - Accepted Manuscripten_UK
dc.author.emailanthony.lee@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date23/04/2019en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Queenslanden_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPsychologyen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Queenslanden_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Queenslanden_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Queenslanden_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Queenslanden_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000518483000003en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85064838906en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1236374en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-8288-3393en_UK
dc.date.accepted2019-03-03en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2019-03-03en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2019-03-01en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionAMen_UK
local.rioxx.authorStower, Rebecca E|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorLee, Anthony J|0000-0001-8288-3393en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMcIntosh, Toneya L|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorSidari, Morgan J|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorSherlock, James M|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorDixson, Barnaby J W|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2020-04-24en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||2020-04-23en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved|2020-04-24|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameManuscript-3.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source0004-0002en_UK
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Manuscript-3.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version516.25 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.