Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/28777
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChapman, Daniel Sen_UK
dc.contributor.authorScalone, Romainen_UK
dc.contributor.authorŠtefanić, Editaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorBullock, James Men_UK
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-13T16:47:46Z-
dc.date.available2019-02-13T16:47:46Z-
dc.date.issued2017-06-30en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/28777-
dc.description.abstractNiche shifts of nonnative plants can occur when they colonize novel climatic conditions. However, the mechanistic basis for niche shifts during invasion is poorly understood and has rarely been captured within species distribution models. We quantified the consequence of between-population variation in phenology for invasion of common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.) across Europe. Ragweed is of serious concern because of its harmful effects as a crop weed and because of its impact on public health as a major aeroallergen. We developed a forward mechanistic species distribution model based on responses of ragweed development rates to temperature and photoperiod. The model was parameterized and validated from the literature and by reanalyzing data from a reciprocal common garden experiment in which native and invasive populations were grown within and beyond the current invaded range. It could therefore accommodate between-population variation in the physiological requirements for flowering, and predict the potentially invaded ranges of individual populations. Northern-origin populations that were established outside the generally accepted climate envelope of the species had lower thermal requirements for bud development, suggesting local adaptation of phenology had occurred during the invasion. The model predicts that this will extend the potentially invaded range northward and increase the average suitability across Europe by 90% in the current climate and 20% in the future climate. Therefore, trait variation observed at the population scale can trigger a climatic niche shift at the biogeographic scale. For ragweed, earlier flowering phenology in established northern populations could allow the species to spread beyond its current invasive range, substantially increasing its risk to agriculture and public health. Mechanistic species distribution models offer the possibility to represent niche shifts by varying the traits and niche responses of individual populations. Ignoring such effects could substantially underestimate the extent and impact of invasions.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons, Ltden_UK
dc.relationChapman DS, Scalone R, Štefanić E & Bullock JM (2017) Mechanistic species distribution modeling reveals a niche shift during invasion. Ecology, 98 (6), pp. 1671-1680. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.1835en_UK
dc.rightsCopyright by the Ecological Society of America. Publisher policy allows the author to post the work in a publicly accessible form on his/her personal or home institution's webpages.en_UK
dc.subjectbiological invasionen_UK
dc.subjectclimate changeen_UK
dc.subjectcommon ragweeden_UK
dc.subjectecological niche modelen_UK
dc.subjectniche conservatismen_UK
dc.subjectprocess-based modelen_UK
dc.subjectrapid evolutionen_UK
dc.titleMechanistic species distribution modeling reveals a niche shift during invasionen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/ecy.1835en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid28369815en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleEcologyen_UK
dc.citation.issn1939-9170en_UK
dc.citation.issn0012-9658en_UK
dc.citation.volume98en_UK
dc.citation.issue6en_UK
dc.citation.spage1671en_UK
dc.citation.epage1680en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.contributor.funderEuropean Commissionen_UK
dc.citation.date02/04/2017en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationCentre for Ecology & Hydrologyen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUppsala Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationJosip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijeken_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationCentre for Ecology & Hydrology (CEH)en_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000402299300018en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85019206823en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1100126en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-1836-4112en_UK
dc.date.accepted2017-03-13en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2017-03-13en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2019-02-12en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorChapman, Daniel S|0000-0003-1836-4112en_UK
local.rioxx.authorScalone, Romain|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorŠtefanić, Edita|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBullock, James M|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectProject ID unknown|European Commission (Horizon 2020)|en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2019-02-12en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved|2019-02-12|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameChapman_et_al-2017-Ecology.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1939-9170en_UK
Appears in Collections:Biological and Environmental Sciences Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Chapman_et_al-2017-Ecology.pdfFulltext - Published Version1.51 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.