Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/28635
Appears in Collections:Biological and Environmental Sciences Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Changes in livelihood practices, strategies and dependence on bushmeat in two provinces in Gabon
Author(s): van Gils, Elke J T
Ingram, Verina J
Midoko Iponga, Donald
Abernethy, Katharine
Contact Email: k.a.abernethy@stir.ac.uk
Keywords: Alternative livelihood strategies
forest resources
bushmeat trade
sustainable livelihoods
rural communities
Issue Date: Mar-2019
Citation: van Gils EJT, Ingram VJ, Midoko Iponga D & Abernethy K (2019) Changes in livelihood practices, strategies and dependence on bushmeat in two provinces in Gabon. International Forestry Review, 21 (1), pp. 108-127.
Abstract: Traditional, forest resource-dependent livelihoods face multiple challenges. In Gabon, bushmeat provides food and income for rural communities. This study investigates how villagers believe livelihood practices and dependence on bushmeat changed over the last decade and if alternative income and food generating strategies can be sustainable. Our results show that remote villages near Moukalaba Doudou National Park hardly changed practices. Less remote villages near Tchibanga experienced declining hunting revenues and are switching to alternatives. Villages near Libreville almost completely changed strategies, and are no longer dependent on forest resources. Changes in livelihood practices were driven either by resource depletion or urbanization. The ability to change depended on proximity to facilities and infrastructure. Although most respondents were able to change, not all alternative strategies are sustainable. The results highlight the need to evaluate the long-term effectiveness of alternative poverty reduction and nature conservation strategies in a context of urbanization and food security. There is a need to reduce bushmeat demand, making supply more sustainable through effective resource governance and creating a conducive institutional and policy environment.
Rights: The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
van Gils et al. - text.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version946.5 kBAdobe PDFUnder Permanent Embargo    Request a copy

Note: If any of the files in this item are currently embargoed, you can request a copy directly from the author by clicking the padlock icon above. However, this facility is dependent on the depositor still being contactable at their original email address.



This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.