Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/28598
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFasolt, Vanessaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorHolzleitner, Iris Jen_UK
dc.contributor.authorLee, Anthony Jen_UK
dc.contributor.authorO'Shea, Kieran Jen_UK
dc.contributor.authorJones, Benedict Cen_UK
dc.contributor.authorDeBruine, Lisa Men_UK
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-23T01:00:15Z-
dc.date.available2019-01-23T01:00:15Z-
dc.date.issued2018-12-31en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/28598-
dc.description.abstractKinship informs the allocation of pro-social and sexual behaviour. In addition to the ability to detect kin who are directly related to the observer, humans are also able to detect relatedness among others who are not related to themselves based on facial cues of relatedness. However, it is unclear what exact facial cues inform these kinship judgments. Facial expression might be one candidate, as it has been shown that a computer kin-detection algorithm can match relatives accurately when the stimuli are smiling. The current study investigated whether a smiling facial expression increases the accuracy of judging relatedness compared to a neutral facial expression in human raters. The stimuli were images of 50 sibling pairs and 50 unrelated pairs (aged 3-17 years) matched for age, ethnicity and sex. The stimuli included both neutral and smiling versions of each individual. Raters (N=77) were asked to judge whether the presented pairs were related or not in one of two counterbalanced versions of the study, where the same stimuli were never presented as both smiling and neutral to the same rater, and the expression within the pair was always the same. Binary relatedness judgments were analysed using binomial logistic mixed regression. Contrary to expectations, smiling decreased the accuracy of relatedness judgments compared to a neutral facial expression. When shown with a smiling expression compared to a neutral one, related pairs were judged to be related less often, while unrelated pairs were judged to be related more often. Evidence that the upper face is mostly used for kinship judgments suggests that smiles could distort or distract from other, more reliable cues of kinship. Pre-registration, data and code available at https://osf.io/58ewu/.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.relationFasolt V, Holzleitner IJ, Lee AJ, O'Shea KJ, Jones BC & DeBruine LM (2018) Facial expressions influence kin recognition accuracy. Human Ethology Bulletin, 33 (4), pp. 19-27. https://doi.org/10.22330/heb/334/019-027en_UK
dc.rightsThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectKinshipen_UK
dc.subjectFace Researchen_UK
dc.subjectFacial Similarityen_UK
dc.subjectAllocentric Kin Recognitionen_UK
dc.titleFacial expressions influence kin recognition accuracyen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2019-01-22en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.22330/heb/334/019-027en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleHuman Ethology Bulletinen_UK
dc.citation.issn2224-4476en_UK
dc.citation.volume33en_UK
dc.citation.issue4en_UK
dc.citation.spage19en_UK
dc.citation.epage27en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusAM - Accepted Manuscripten_UK
dc.contributor.funderEuropean Commissionen_UK
dc.author.emailanthony.lee@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Glasgowen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Glasgowen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Glasgowen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Glasgowen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Glasgowen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Glasgowen_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1093364en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-8288-3393en_UK
dc.date.accepted2019-01-17en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2019-01-17en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2019-01-22en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot chargeden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionAMen_UK
local.rioxx.authorFasolt, Vanessa|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorHolzleitner, Iris J|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorLee, Anthony J|0000-0001-8288-3393en_UK
local.rioxx.authorO'Shea, Kieran J|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorJones, Benedict C|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorDeBruine, Lisa M|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectProject ID unknown|European Commission (Horizon 2020)|en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2019-01-22en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/|2019-01-22|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameAccepted Manuscript-LeeHEB.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source2224-4476en_UK
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Accepted Manuscript-LeeHEB.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version557.61 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.