Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/2857
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorOliver, Daviden_UK
dc.contributor.authorPage, Trevoren_UK
dc.contributor.authorHeathwaite, A Louiseen_UK
dc.contributor.authorHaygarth, Philip Men_UK
dc.date.accessioned2013-01-07T23:08:25Z-
dc.date.available2013-01-07T23:08:25Z-
dc.date.issued2010-01en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/2857-
dc.description.abstractDung-pats excreted directly on pasture from grazing animals can contribute a significant burden of faecal microbes to agricultural land. The aim of this study was to use a combined field and modelling approach to determine the importance of Escherichia coli growth in dung-pats when predicting faecal bacteria accumulation on grazed grassland. To do this an empirical model was developed to predict the dynamics of an E. coli reservoir within 1 ha plots each grazed by four beef steers for six months. Published first-order die-off coefficients were used within the model to describe the expected decline of E. coli in dung-pats. Modelled estimates using first-order kinetics led to an underestimation of the observed E. coli land reservoir, when using site-specific die-off coefficients. A simultaneous experiment determined the die-off profiles of E. coli within fresh faeces of beef cattle under field relevant conditions and suggested that faecal bacteria may experience growth and re-growth in the period post defecation when exposed to a complex interaction of environmental drivers such as variable temperature, UV radiation and moisture levels. This growth phase in dung-pats is not accounted for in models based on first-order die-off coefficients. When the model was amended to incorporate the growth of E. coli, equivalent to that observed in the field study, the prediction of the E. coli reservoir was improved with respect to the observed data and produced a previously unquantified step-change improvement in model predictions of the accumulation of these faecal bacteria on grasslands. Results from this study suggest that the use of first-order kinetic equations for determining land-based reservoirs of faecal bacteria should be approached with caution and greater emphasis placed on accounting for actual survival patterns observed under field relevant conditions.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherElsevieren_UK
dc.relationOliver D, Page T, Heathwaite AL & Haygarth PM (2010) Re-shaping models of E.coli population dynamics in livestock faeces: Increased bacterial risk to humans?. Environment International, 36 (1), pp. 1-7. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/01604120; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2009.08.006en_UK
dc.rightsPublished in Environment International by Elsevier. Environment International, Volume 36, Issue 1, January 2010, pp. 1 - 7.; This is the peer reviewed version of this article.; NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Environment International. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Environment International, VOL 36, ISSUE 1, (January 2010). DOI 10.1016/j.envint.2009.08.006en_UK
dc.subjectdie-offen_UK
dc.subjectE. colien_UK
dc.subjectgrowthen_UK
dc.subjecthealthen_UK
dc.subjectpathogenen_UK
dc.subjectcattle faecesen_UK
dc.subjectgrazingen_UK
dc.subjectsoilen_UK
dc.subjectGrassland ecologyen_UK
dc.subjectEscherichia colien_UK
dc.titleRe-shaping models of E.coli population dynamics in livestock faeces: Increased bacterial risk to humans?en_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.envint.2009.08.006en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleEnvironment Internationalen_UK
dc.citation.issn0160-4120en_UK
dc.citation.volume36en_UK
dc.citation.issue1en_UK
dc.citation.spage1en_UK
dc.citation.epage7en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusAM - Accepted Manuscripten_UK
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/01604120en_UK
dc.author.emaildavid.oliver@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBiological and Environmental Sciencesen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationLancaster Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationLancaster Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationLancaster Universityen_UK
dc.identifier.wtid832211en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-6200-562Xen_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2010-01-31en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2011-04-08en_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionAMen_UK
local.rioxx.authorOliver, David|0000-0002-6200-562Xen_UK
local.rioxx.authorPage, Trevor|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorHeathwaite, A Louise|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorHaygarth, Philip M|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2011-04-08en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved|2011-04-08|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameRowden model and growth_Env Int_REVISED AUGUST 2009.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source0160-4120en_UK
Appears in Collections:Biological and Environmental Sciences Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Rowden model and growth_Env Int_REVISED AUGUST 2009.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version230.52 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.