Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1893/28571
Appears in Collections: | Aquaculture Journal Articles |
Peer Review Status: | Refereed |
Title: | Social fit of coral reef governance varies among individuals |
Author(s): | Turner, Rachel A Forster, Johanna Fitzsimmons, Clare Gill, David Mahon, Robin Peterson, Angelie Stead, Selina M |
Keywords: | Caribbean community perceptions institutional fit natural resource management social acceptance |
Issue Date: | 30-Jun-2018 |
Date Deposited: | 17-Jan-2019 |
Citation: | Turner RA, Forster J, Fitzsimmons C, Gill D, Mahon R, Peterson A & Stead SM (2018) Social fit of coral reef governance varies among individuals. Conservation Letters, 11 (3), Art. No.: e12422. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12422 |
Abstract: | Improved natural resource governance is critical for the effective conservation of ecosystems, and the well-being of societies that depend on them. Understanding the social fit of institutional arrangements in different contexts can help guide the design of effective environmental governance. This empirical study assessed individual-level variation in institutional acceptance of coral reef governance among 652 respondents in 12 fishing and tourism-oriented communities in the Wider Caribbean. High institutional acceptance was strongly associated with perceptions of community cohesiveness, underlining the potential contribution of civil society to effective governance processes. Institutional acceptance was also influenced by reef use, awareness of rules, perceived trends in reef fish populations, education, and contextual community-level factors. Understanding what influences diverse perceptions of coral reef governance among individuals can help to assess the likelihood of support for conservation measures. This study highlights how knowledge of institutional acceptance can inform the design of more targeted interventions that enhance the social fit of conservation governance to local contexts and diverse resource users. |
DOI Link: | 10.1111/conl.12422 |
Rights: | This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the originalwork is properly cited.Copyright and Photocopying: © 2017 The Authors. Conservation Letters published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc |
Licence URL(s): | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Turner_et_al-2018-Conservation_Letters.pdf | Fulltext - Published Version | 213.21 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is protected by original copyright |
A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.