Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/28526
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMyrseth, Kristian Oveen_UK
dc.contributor.authorWollbrant, Connyen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-16T17:06:49Z-
dc.date.available2019-01-16T17:06:49Z-
dc.date.issued2015-05-31en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/28526-
dc.description.abstractKieslich and Hilbig (2014) employ a mouse-tracking technique to measure decision conflict in social dilemmas. They report that defectors exhibit more conflict than do cooperators. They infer that cooperation thus is the reflexive, default behavior. We argue, however, that their analysis fails to discriminate between reflexive versus cognitively controlled behavioral responses. This is because cognitive conflict can emanate from resisting impulse successfully—or unsuccessfully.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.relationMyrseth KO & Wollbrant C (2015) Less cognitive conflict does not imply choice of the default option: Commentary on Kieslich and Hilbig (2014). [Commentary on: Kieslich, P. J., & Hilbig, B. E. (2014). Cognitive conflict in social dilemmas: An analysis of response dynamics. Judgment and Decision Making, 9(6), 510–522.] Judgement and Decision Making, 10 (3), pp. 277-279. http://journal.sjdm.org/14/141214/jdm141214.pdf.en_UK
dc.relation.isbasedonKieslich, P. J., & Hilbig, B. E. (2014). Cognitive conflict in social dilemmas: An analysis of response dynamics. Judgment and Decision Making, 9(6), 510–522.en_UK
dc.rightsCopyright: © 2015. The authors license this article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).en_UK
dc.subjectsocial dilemmaen_UK
dc.subjectcooperationen_UK
dc.subjectintuitionen_UK
dc.subjectcognitive conflicten_UK
dc.subjectself-controlen_UK
dc.titleLess cognitive conflict does not imply choice of the default option: Commentary on Kieslich and Hilbig (2014)en_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.citation.jtitleJudgement and Decision Makingen_UK
dc.citation.issn1930-2975en_UK
dc.citation.volume10en_UK
dc.citation.issue3en_UK
dc.citation.spage277en_UK
dc.citation.epage279en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.identifier.urlhttp://journal.sjdm.org/14/141214/jdm141214.pdfen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of St Andrewsen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Gothenburgen_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84930352511en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1084200en_UK
dc.date.firstcompliantdepositdate2019-01-09en_UK
Appears in Collections:Economics Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
C17_Less cognitive conflict.pdfFulltext - Published Version59.47 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.