Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/28471
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHunter, Frederick D Len_UK
dc.contributor.authorBussière, Luc Fen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-11T01:01:31Z-
dc.date.available2019-01-11T01:01:31Z-
dc.date.issued2019-06en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/28471-
dc.description.abstract1. Sexually selected ornaments are highly variable, even among closely related species, and the ultimate causes of variation in ornament evolution are unclear, including in rare cases of female ornament expression. One hypothesis is that differences across species in female reproductive allocation may help to explain patterns of female ornament expression among insects with nuptial gifts. 2. Dance flies (Diptera: Empididae: Empidinae) vary considerably among species in the presence and extravagance of female ornaments, which probably evolved through female contests for mates. In most dance flies, adult females appear to acquire all their dietary protein from nuptial gifts provided by males during mating. The importance of nuptial feeding on egg development is not yet known. 3. To test the prediction that the presence of female ornaments reflects differences in the degree to which females rely on nuptial feeding for egg development, egg development was examined in wild females of two species, one ornamented and the other unornamented. An ageing technique based on cuticular bands was validated, which permitted a regression of egg size on adult age. 4. We found that egg development depended on mating status in the ornamented species alone, meaning the eggs of unmated females of the ornamented species did not develop. This contrast across species is consistent with expectations that females of different species vary in their dependence on nuptial gifts for egg development. 5. These findings provide preliminary support for the hypothesis that differences in reproductive allocation mediate the intensity of female contests for nuptial gifts.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherWileyen_UK
dc.relationHunter FDL & Bussière LF (2019) Comparative evidence supports a role for reproductive allocation in the evolution of female ornament diversity. Ecological Entomology, 44 (3), pp. 324-332. https://doi.org/10.1111/een.12707en_UK
dc.rightsThis item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study. This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Hunter, F. D. and Bussière, L. F. (2019), Comparative evidence supports a role for reproductive allocation in the evolution of female ornament diversity. Ecol Entomol, 44: 324-332, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/een.12707. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttps://storre.stir.ac.uk/STORREEndUserLicence.pdfen_UK
dc.subjectanautogenyen_UK
dc.subjectcourtship feeding female ornamentsen_UK
dc.subjectmate choiceen_UK
dc.subjectreproductive allocationen_UK
dc.subjectsexual competitionen_UK
dc.titleComparative evidence supports a role for reproductive allocation in the evolution of female ornament diversityen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2019-12-11en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[HunterBussiere_AAMwFigs.pdf] Publisher requires embargo of 12 months after formal publication.en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/een.12707en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleEcological Entomologyen_UK
dc.citation.issn1365-2311en_UK
dc.citation.issn0307-6946en_UK
dc.citation.volume44en_UK
dc.citation.issue3en_UK
dc.citation.spage324en_UK
dc.citation.epage332en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusAM - Accepted Manuscripten_UK
dc.author.emailluc.bussiere@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date10/12/2018en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBiological and Environmental Sciencesen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000467427900004en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85058155764en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1083861en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-8937-8381en_UK
dc.date.accepted2018-10-27en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2018-10-27en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2019-01-10en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionAMen_UK
local.rioxx.authorHunter, Frederick D L|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBussière, Luc F|0000-0001-8937-8381en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2019-12-11en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||2019-12-10en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttps://storre.stir.ac.uk/STORREEndUserLicence.pdf|2019-12-11|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameHunterBussiere_AAMwFigs.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1365-2311en_UK
Appears in Collections:Biological and Environmental Sciences Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
HunterBussiere_AAMwFigs.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version1.28 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.