|Appears in Collections:||Law and Philosophy Journal Articles|
|Peer Review Status:||Refereed|
|Title:||Functionalism and Thinking Animals|
|Author(s):||Árnadóttir, Steinvör Thöll|
|Citation:||Árnadóttir ST (2010) Functionalism and Thinking Animals. Philosophical Studies, 147 (3), pp. 347-354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-008-9287-0|
|Abstract:||Lockean accounts of personal identity face a problem of too many thinkers arising from their denial that we are identical to our animals and the assumption that our animals can think. Sydney Shoemaker has responded to this problem by arguing that it is a consequence of functionalism that only things with psychological persistence conditions can have mental properties, and thus that animals cannot think. I discuss Shoemaker’s argument and demonstrate two ways in which it fails. Functionalism does not rid the Lockean of the problem of too many thinkers.|
|Rights:||Published in Philosophical Studies by Springer Verlag. The original publication is available at www.springerlink.com|
|Functionalism.pdf||Fulltext - Accepted Version||121.83 kB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
This item is protected by original copyright
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact email@example.com providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.