Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/28265
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorScheba, Andreasen_UK
dc.contributor.authorRakotonarivo, O Sarobidyen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-21T01:04:02Z-
dc.date.available2018-11-21T01:04:02Z-
dc.date.issued2016-11-30en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/28265-
dc.description.abstractIn this paper we use the lens of political ecology to shed light on the causes and effects of pro-poor REDD+ induced land use conflicts. We build our study on recent theoretical work on territorialisation in nature conservation to analyse the conflicts and outcomes of the TFCG/Mjumita REDD+ project in Lindi, Tanzania. Drawing on qualitative fieldwork in two case study villages we argue that conservation organisations increasingly make use of participatory tools, FPIC procedures and good governance principles to include local populations in the creation of what we call market-based conservation territories (MBCT). In contrast to project developer’s claims of win–win benefits, we highlight the mixed outcomes of MBCTs and argue that their performance-driven nature and reliance on formal governance arrangements lead to the enclosure of common forests. This inevitably causes conflicts between and within villages over the meaning, ownership and access to forest resources, especially given the importance of customary relations in tropical rural contexts. We argue that despite the extensive community engagement strategy and genuine pro-poor approach of the REDD+ project, project proponents were unable to prevent land use conflicts and risks of economic and physical displacement. The specific social, economic and political conditions shaped the implementation of the project which led to negative consequences to some stakeholders despite genuinely noble intentions. Therefore, we argue that in order to achieve more positive results when creating MBCT, project developers must better acknowledge the inherent trade-offs of markets in conservation and take the limitations and realities of local governance context better into account. We suggest a more explicit assessment of social and environmental justice in the project and more context-specific efforts to prevent social harm from conservation. Theoretically, our study contributes to a better understanding of territorialisation processes under the current trend of market-based conservation.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherElsevier BVen_UK
dc.relationScheba A & Rakotonarivo OS (2016) Territorialising REDD+: Conflicts over market-based forest conservation in Lindi, Tanzania. Land Use Policy, 57, pp. 625-637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.06.028en_UK
dc.rightsThe publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserveden_UK
dc.subjectGeography, Planning and Developmenten_UK
dc.subjectForestryen_UK
dc.subjectManagement, Monitoring, Policy and Lawen_UK
dc.subjectNature and Landscape Conservationen_UK
dc.titleTerritorialising REDD+: Conflicts over market-based forest conservation in Lindi, Tanzaniaen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2999-12-31en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[1-s2.0-S0264837716300370-main.pdf] The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository therefore there is an embargo on the full text of the work.en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.06.028en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleLand Use Policyen_UK
dc.citation.issn0264-8377en_UK
dc.citation.volume57en_UK
dc.citation.spage625en_UK
dc.citation.epage637en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.contributor.funderUniversity of Manchesteren_UK
dc.author.emailsarobidy.rakotonarivo@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date25/07/2016en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationHSRCen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBangor Universityen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000382341200056en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84979021497en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1056532en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-8078-4997en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-8032-1431en_UK
dc.date.accepted2016-06-22en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2016-06-22en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2018-11-20en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorScheba, Andreas|0000-0002-8078-4997en_UK
local.rioxx.authorRakotonarivo, O Sarobidy|0000-0002-8032-1431en_UK
local.rioxx.projectProject ID unknown|University of Manchester|http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000770en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2266-06-26en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||en_UK
local.rioxx.filename1-s2.0-S0264837716300370-main.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source0264-8377en_UK
Appears in Collections:Biological and Environmental Sciences Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1-s2.0-S0264837716300370-main.pdfFulltext - Published Version641.36 kBAdobe PDFUnder Permanent Embargo    Request a copy


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.