Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/28225
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPope, Paulen_UK
dc.contributor.authorHolton, Andrewen_UK
dc.contributor.authorHassan, Samehen_UK
dc.contributor.authorKourtis, Dimitriosen_UK
dc.contributor.authorPraamstra, Peteren_UK
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-14T01:06:05Z-
dc.date.available2018-11-14T01:06:05Z-
dc.date.issued2007-05-31en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/28225-
dc.description.abstractObjective: We used the lateralized readiness potential (LRP) to investigate cortical mechanisms underlying the termination of muscle contraction. Active suppression and withdrawal of activation have been proposed as underlying mechanisms in isotonic and isometric relaxation.  Methods: Experiment 1 investigated isotonic wrist extension/release from extension. Experiment 2 investigated isometric activation/relaxation of a pinch grip. Tasks were performed with left and right hands and cued auditorily at variable intervals. EEG was recorded from 128 electrodes and processed to derive the LRP timelocked to the onset and offset of muscle contraction.  Results: LRPs for isotonic activation and relaxation were of identical amplitude at electrodes overlying the motor cortex, but differed at frontal locations due to higher amplitude re-afferent activity during activation. The isometric LRP was significantly smaller during relaxation than during activation, without differences in scalp distribution. Conclusion: The LRP findings confirm differences between isotonic and isometric relaxation, which may be partly explained by the need to suppress a stretch reflex in the former condition. The presence of an LRP associated with isometric relaxation reveals active preparation in the motor cortex, indicating that muscle relaxation in the isometric task cannot be explained solely by withdrawal of activation. Significance: High-density LRP recordings isolate different cortical mechanisms underlying the termination of muscle contraction. © 2007 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherElsevier Scienceen_UK
dc.relationPope P, Holton A, Hassan S, Kourtis D & Praamstra P (2007) Cortical control of muscle relaxation: A lateralized readiness potential (LRP) investigation. Clinical Neurophysiology, 118 (5), pp. 1044-1052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2007.02.002en_UK
dc.rightsThe publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserveden_UK
dc.subjectEEGen_UK
dc.subjectlateralized readiness potentialen_UK
dc.subjectmovement-related potentialsen_UK
dc.subjectmuscle relaxationen_UK
dc.subjectinhibitionen_UK
dc.titleCortical control of muscle relaxation: A lateralized readiness potential (LRP) investigationen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2999-12-31en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[2007_Pope_etal_ClinNeurophy.pdf] The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository therefore there is an embargo on the full text of the work.en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.clinph.2007.02.002en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid17382586en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleClinical Neurophysiologyen_UK
dc.citation.issn1388-2457en_UK
dc.citation.volume118en_UK
dc.citation.issue5en_UK
dc.citation.spage1044en_UK
dc.citation.epage1052en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.contributor.funderMedical Research Councilen_UK
dc.author.emaildimitrios.kourtis@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date26/03/2007en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Birminghamen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Birminghamen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Birminghamen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Birminghamen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Birminghamen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000246437300009en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-34047114515en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid520108en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-2535-6196en_UK
dc.date.accepted2007-02-07en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2007-02-07en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2018-11-07en_UK
rioxxterms.apcunknownen_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorPope, Paul|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorHolton, Andrew|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorHassan, Sameh|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorKourtis, Dimitrios|0000-0003-2535-6196en_UK
local.rioxx.authorPraamstra, Peter|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectProject ID unknown|Medical Research Council|http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000265en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2257-02-27en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||en_UK
local.rioxx.filename2007_Pope_etal_ClinNeurophy.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1388-2457en_UK
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2007_Pope_etal_ClinNeurophy.pdfFulltext - Published Version418.59 kBAdobe PDFUnder Permanent Embargo    Request a copy


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.