|Appears in Collections:||Computing Science and Mathematics Conference Papers and Proceedings|
|Title:||Providing alternative declarative descriptions for entity sets using parallel concept lattices|
|Citation:||Gottron T, Scherp A & Scheglmann S (2014) Providing alternative declarative descriptions for entity sets using parallel concept lattices. In: Presutti V, d’Amato C, Gandon F, d’Aquin M, Staab S & Tordai A (eds.) The Semantic Web: Trends and Challenges. ESWC 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Sciences, 8465. 11th International Conference, European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC) 2014, Anissaras, Greece, 25.05.2014-29.05.2014. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Verlag, pp. 364-379. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07443-6_25|
|Series/Report no.:||Lecture Notes in Computer Sciences, 8465|
|Conference Name:||11th International Conference, European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC) 2014|
|Conference Dates:||2014-05-25 - 2014-05-29|
|Conference Location:||Anissaras, Greece|
|Abstract:||We propose an approach for modifying a declarative description of a set of entities (e.g., a SPARQL query) for the purpose of finding alternative declarative descriptions for the entities. Such a shift in representation can help to get new insights into the data, to discover related attributes, or to find a more concise description of the entities of interest. Allowing the alternative descriptions furthermore to be close approximations of the original entity set leads to more flexibility in finding such insights. Our approach is based on the construction of parallel formal concept lattices over different sets of attributes for the same entities. Between the formal concepts in the parallel lattices, we define mappings which constitute approximations of the extent of the concepts. In this paper, we formalise the idea of two types of mappings between parallel concept lattices, provide an implementation of these mappings and evaluate their ability to find alternative descriptions in a scenario of several real-world RDF data sets. In this scenario we use descriptions for entities based on RDF classes and seek for alternative representations based on properties associated with the entities.|
|Status:||VoR - Version of Record|
|Rights:||The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.|
|Gottron et al 2014.pdf||Fulltext - Published Version||350.76 kB||Adobe PDF||Under Permanent Embargo Request a copy|
Note: If any of the files in this item are currently embargoed, you can request a copy directly from the author by clicking the padlock icon above. However, this facility is dependent on the depositor still being contactable at their original email address.
This item is protected by original copyright
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.