|Appears in Collections:||Computing Science and Mathematics Conference Papers and Proceedings|
|Title:||Survey on common strategies of vocabulary reuse in linked open data modeling|
|Citation:||Schaible J, Gottron T & Scherp A (2014) Survey on common strategies of vocabulary reuse in linked open data modeling. In: Presutti V, d’Amato C, Gandon F, d’Aquin M, Staab S & Tordai A (eds.) The Semantic Web: Trends and Challenges. ESWC 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 8465. 11th International Conference, European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC) 2014, Anissaras, Greece, 25.05.2014-29.05.2014. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Verlag, pp. 457-472. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07443-6_31|
|Series/Report no.:||Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 8465|
|Conference Name:||11th International Conference, European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC) 2014|
|Conference Dates:||2014-05-25 - 2014-05-29|
|Conference Location:||Anissaras, Greece|
|Abstract:||The choice of which vocabulary to reuse when modeling and publishing Linked Open Data (LOD) is far from trivial. There is no study that investigates the different strategies of reusing vocabularies for LOD modeling and publishing. In this paper, we present the results of a survey with 79 participants that examines the most preferred vocabulary reuse strategies of LOD modeling. The participants, LOD publishers and practitioners, were asked to assess different vocabulary reuse strategies and explain their ranking decision. We found significant differences between the modeling strategies that range from reusing popular vocabularies, minimizing the number of vocabularies, and staying within one domain vocabulary. A very interesting insight is that the popularity in the meaning of how frequent a vocabulary is used in a data source is more important than how often individual classes and properties are used in the LOD cloud. Overall, the results of this survey help in better understanding the strategies how data engineers reuse vocabularies and may also be used to develop future vocabulary engineering tools.|
|Status:||VoR - Version of Record|
|Rights:||The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.|
|Schaible et al 2014.pdf||Fulltext - Published Version||308.84 kB||Adobe PDF||Under Permanent Embargo Request a copy|
Note: If any of the files in this item are currently embargoed, you can request a copy directly from the author by clicking the padlock icon above. However, this facility is dependent on the depositor still being contactable at their original email address.
This item is protected by original copyright
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact email@example.com providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.