Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/27964
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKirkpatrick, Lucindaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorGraham, Jenniferen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMcGregor, Seanen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMunro, Lynnen_UK
dc.contributor.authorScoarize, Matheusen_UK
dc.contributor.authorPark, Kirstyen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-13T00:01:27Z-
dc.date.available2018-10-13T00:01:27Z-
dc.date.issued2018-10-04en_UK
dc.identifier.othere0204511en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/27964-
dc.description.abstractThere is growing recognition that with sympathetic management, plantation forests may contain more biodiversity than previously thought. However, the extent to which they may support bat populations is contentious. Many studies have demonstrated active avoidance of coniferous plantations and attributed this to the lack of available roost sites and low invertebrate density. In contrast, other work , carried out in plantation dominated landscapes have shown that certain bat species are able to exploit these areas. However, the extent to which bats use plantations for roosting and foraging, or simply move through the plantation matrix to access more favourable sites is unclear. We radio tracked female Pipistrellus pygmaeus over two summers to establish the extent to which individual bats use Sitka Spruce plantations in southern Scotland for foraging and roosting and assess the implications for felling operations on bats. Maternity roosts identified (n=17) were in all in buildings and most were large (> 500 individuals). We found no evidence of bats roosting in mature Sitka Spruce crop trees, although several bats used roosts in old or dead beech and oak trees as an alternative to their main maternity roost. Home ranges were much larger (mean 9.6 ± 3.12 km2) than those reported from other studies ((0.6 – 1.6 km2), and it is likely that roost availability rather than food abundance constrains P. pygmaeus use of Sitka Spruce plantations. At the landscape scale, most individuals selected coniferous habitats over other habitat types, covering large distances to access plantation areas, whilst at a local scale bats used forest tracks to access water, felled stands or patches of broadleaf cover within the plantation. Sitka Spruce plantations support a high abundance of Culicoides impuctatus, the Highland midge which may act as a reliable and plentiful food source for females during lactation, an energetically expensive period. The use of felled stands for foraging by bats has implications for forest management as wind turbines, following small-scale felling operations, are increasingly being installed in plantations; wind turbines have been associated with high bat mortality in some countries. Decisions about siting wind turbines in upland plantations should consider the likelihood of increased bat activity post felling.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherPublic Library of Science (PLoS)en_UK
dc.relationKirkpatrick L, Graham J, McGregor S, Munro L, Scoarize M & Park K (2018) Flexible foraging strategies in Pipistrellus pygmaeus in response to abundant but ephemeral prey. PLOS ONE, 13 (10), Art. No.: e0204511. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204511en_UK
dc.rights© 2018 Kirkpatrick et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_UK
dc.titleFlexible foraging strategies in Pipistrellus pygmaeus in response to abundant but ephemeral preyen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0204511en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid30286111en_UK
dc.citation.jtitlePLoS ONEen_UK
dc.citation.issn1932-6203en_UK
dc.citation.volume13en_UK
dc.citation.issue10en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.contributor.funderForestry Commission (Scotland)en_UK
dc.citation.date04/10/2018en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Lausanneen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Maringaen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBiological and Environmental Sciencesen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000446383500023en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85054459806en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1031317en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-0161-2469en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-6080-7197en_UK
dc.date.accepted2018-09-10en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2018-09-10en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2018-10-12en_UK
dc.relation.funderprojectThe use of coniferous plantations by batsen_UK
dc.relation.funderrefn/aen_UK
dc.subject.tagEnvironmental Changeen_UK
rioxxterms.apcpaiden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorKirkpatrick, Lucinda|0000-0002-0161-2469en_UK
local.rioxx.authorGraham, Jennifer|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMcGregor, Sean|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMunro, Lynn|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorScoarize, Matheus|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorPark, Kirsty|0000-0001-6080-7197en_UK
local.rioxx.projectn/a|Forestry Commission (Scotland)|en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2018-10-12en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2018-10-12|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenamejournal.pone.0204511.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1932-6203en_UK
Appears in Collections:Biological and Environmental Sciences Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
journal.pone.0204511.pdfFulltext - Published Version5.52 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.