Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/27573
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNicholls, Elizabethen_UK
dc.contributor.authorBotías, Cristinaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorRotheray, Ellen Len_UK
dc.contributor.authorWhitehorn, Penelopeen_UK
dc.contributor.authorDavid, Arthuren_UK
dc.contributor.authorFowler, Roberten_UK
dc.contributor.authorDavid, Thomasen_UK
dc.contributor.authorFeltham, Hannahen_UK
dc.contributor.authorSwain, Jennifer Len_UK
dc.contributor.authorWells, Patriciaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorHill, Elizabeth Men_UK
dc.contributor.authorOsborne, Juliet Len_UK
dc.contributor.authorGoulson, Daveen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-31T08:46:53Z-
dc.date.available2018-07-31T08:46:53Z-
dc.date.issued2018-08-21en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/27573-
dc.description.abstractConcerns regarding the impact of neonicotinoid exposure on bee populations recently led to an EU-wide moratorium on the use of certain neonicotinoids on flowering crops. Currently evidence regarding the impact, if any, the moratorium has had on bees’ exposure is limited. We sampled pollen and nectar from bumblebee colonies in rural and peri-urban habitats in three UK regions; Stirlingshire, Hertfordshire and Sussex. Colonies were sampled over three years; prior to the ban (2013), during the initial implementation when some seed-treated winter-sown oilseed rape was still grown (2014), and following the ban (2015). To compare species-level differences, in 2014 only, honeybee colonies in rural habitats were also sampled. Over half of all samples were found to be contaminated (n=408), with thiamethoxam being the compound detected at the highest concentrations in honeybee- (up to 2.29 ng/g in nectar in 2014, median≤0.1 ng/g, n=79) and bumblebee-collected pollen and nectar (up to 38.77 ng/g in pollen in 2013, median ≤0.12 ng/g, n=76). Honeybees were exposed to higher concentrations of neonicotinoids than bumblebees in 2014. While neonicotinoid exposure for rural bumblebees declined post-ban (2015), suggesting a positive impact of the moratorium, the risk of neonicotinoid exposure for bumblebees in peri-urban habitats remained largely the same between 2013 and 2015.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherAmerican Chemical Societyen_UK
dc.relationNicholls E, Botías C, Rotheray EL, Whitehorn P, David A, Fowler R, David T, Feltham H, Swain JL, Wells P, Hill EM, Osborne JL & Goulson D (2018) Monitoring neonicotinoid exposure for bees in rural and peri-urban areas of the UK during the transition from pre- to post-moratorium. Environmental Science and Technology, 52 (16), pp. 9391-9402. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b06573en_UK
dc.rightsThis item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study. This document is the Accepted Manuscript version of a Published Work that appeared in final form in Environmental Science and Technology, copyright © American Chemical Society after peer review and technical editing by the publisher. To access the final edited and published work see https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b06573en_UK
dc.titleMonitoring neonicotinoid exposure for bees in rural and peri-urban areas of the UK during the transition from pre- to post-moratoriumen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2019-06-29en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[acs.est.7b06573.pdf] Publisher requires embargo of 12 months after formal publication.en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1021/acs.est.7b06573en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleEnvironmental Science and Technologyen_UK
dc.citation.issn1520-5851en_UK
dc.citation.issn0013-936Xen_UK
dc.citation.volume52en_UK
dc.citation.issue16en_UK
dc.citation.spage9391en_UK
dc.citation.epage9402en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusAM - Accepted Manuscripten_UK
dc.contributor.funderBiotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Councilen_UK
dc.citation.date28/06/2018en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Sussexen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Sussexen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Sussexen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBiological and Environmental Sciencesen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Sussexen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Sussexen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Sussexen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationRothamsted Researchen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationRothamsted Researchen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Sussexen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Exeteren_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Sussexen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000442706700042en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85049376459en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid956601en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-9852-1012en_UK
dc.date.accepted2017-12-21en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2017-12-21en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2018-07-30en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionAMen_UK
local.rioxx.authorNicholls, Elizabeth|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBotías, Cristina|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorRotheray, Ellen L|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorWhitehorn, Penelope|0000-0001-9852-1012en_UK
local.rioxx.authorDavid, Arthur|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorFowler, Robert|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorDavid, Thomas|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorFeltham, Hannah|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorSwain, Jennifer L|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorWells, Patricia|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorHill, Elizabeth M|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorOsborne, Juliet L|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorGoulson, Dave|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectProject ID unknown|Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council|http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000268en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2019-06-29en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||2019-06-28en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved|2019-06-29|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameacs.est.7b06573.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source0013-936Xen_UK
Appears in Collections:Biological and Environmental Sciences Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
acs.est.7b06573.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version699.14 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.