Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/27561
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWaddington, Kateen_UK
dc.contributor.authorBayliss, Alexandraen_UK
dc.contributor.authorHigham, Thomasen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMadgwick, Richarden_UK
dc.contributor.authorSharples, Naillen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-26T00:01:56Z-
dc.date.available2018-07-26T00:01:56Z-
dc.date.issued2019en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/27561-
dc.description.abstractThe Late Bronze Age–Early Iron Age midden sites of Southern Britain are amongst the richest archaeological sites in the country. The organic accumulations contain substantial quantities of animal bone, decorated ceramics, metalwork and other objects; the often deep stratigraphy allows for a number of changes in material culture and depositional practices, food production and consumption, and shifts in social identities, to be traced through time. The well-stratified assemblages also provide useful materials for dating the deposits. This has been problematic, however, as the majority of samples produce unhelpfully broad calibrated radiocarbon dates, due to the effects of the earlier Iron Age plateau in the calibration curve, which spans c. 800–400 BC. Interpretation has relied on current understandings of the associated pottery and metalwork, which placed most midden sites somewhere between the tenth and the seventh/mid-sixth centuries cal BC (c. 1000–600/550 cal BC), but the end-date of these traditions is particularly uncertain. This article addresses this issue by presenting the results of a new dating programme for East Chisenbury in Wiltshire, southern England. Twenty-eight radiocarbon determinations were obtained and combined with the site stratigraphy in a Bayesian chronological model. The results have transformed the chronology of the site, with the end of the occupation sequence being pulled forwardpushed back some one-hundred years, to the mid-to-late fifth century cal BC. These new chronologies have significant implications for our understanding of the Late Bronze Age–Early Iron Age transition and require a revision of the currently accepted chronology of post-Deverel Rimbury decorated wares in south-central England.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis (Routledge)en_UK
dc.relationWaddington K, Bayliss A, Higham T, Madgwick R & Sharples N (2019) Histories of deposition: creating chronologies for the Late Bronze Age-Early Iron Age transition in southern Britain. Archaeological Journal, 176 (1), pp. 84-133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00665983.2018.1504859en_UK
dc.rightsThis item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.en_UK
dc.titleHistories of deposition: creating chronologies for the Late Bronze Age-Early Iron Age transition in southern Britainen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2020-04-25en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[East Chisenbury v7_post review edits_AB and KW_RM NS_TH.pdf] Until this work is published there will be an embargo on the full text of this work. Publisher requires embargo of 18 months after formal publication.en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/00665983.2018.1504859en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleArchaeological Journalen_UK
dc.citation.issn2373-2288en_UK
dc.citation.issn0066-5983en_UK
dc.citation.volume176en_UK
dc.citation.issue1en_UK
dc.citation.spage84en_UK
dc.citation.epage133en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusAM - Accepted Manuscripten_UK
dc.contributor.funderArts and Humanities Research Councilen_UK
dc.author.emailalexandra.bayliss@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date24/10/2018en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBangor Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBiological and Environmental Sciencesen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Oxforden_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationCardiff Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationCardiff Universityen_UK
dc.identifier.wtid953162en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-2782-1979en_UK
dc.date.accepted2018-07-24en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2018-07-24en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2018-07-24en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionAMen_UK
local.rioxx.authorWaddington, Kate|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBayliss, Alexandra|0000-0003-2782-1979en_UK
local.rioxx.authorHigham, Thomas|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMadgwick, Richard|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorSharples, Naill|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectProject ID unknown|Arts and Humanities Research Council|http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000267en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2020-04-25en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||2020-04-24en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved|2020-04-25|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameEast Chisenbury v7_post review edits_AB and KW_RM NS_TH.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source2373-2288en_UK
Appears in Collections:Biological and Environmental Sciences Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
East Chisenbury v7_post review edits_AB and KW_RM NS_TH.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version548.63 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.