Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/27543
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWetherall, Karenen_UK
dc.contributor.authorCleare, Seonaiden_UK
dc.contributor.authorEschle, Sarahen_UK
dc.contributor.authorFerguson, Eamonnen_UK
dc.contributor.authorO’Connor, Daryl Ben_UK
dc.contributor.authorO’Carroll, Ronan Een_UK
dc.contributor.authorO’Connor, Rory Cen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-25T00:00:56Z-
dc.date.available2018-07-25T00:00:56Z-
dc.date.issued2018-12-01en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/27543-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Although many suicide risk factors have been identified, there is still relatively little known about the factors that differentiate those who think about suicide from those who make a suicide attempt. Aims: Using the integrated motivational-volitional model (IMV) of suicidal behaviour as a framework, this study hypothesised that i) motivational and volitional phase factors would differentiate non-suicidal controls from those who had a history of suicidal ideation or suicide attempts, and ii) only volitional phase factors would differentiate between those who had a history of suicidal ideation and those who had attempted suicide. Method: The Scottish Wellbeing Study (n=3508) is a nationally representative study of young people (18-34 years) recruited throughout Scotland. Using multinomial regression analysis, three groups (non-suicidal control (n=2534), lifetime suicide ideation (n=498) and lifetime suicide attempt (n=403) groups) were compared on motivational and volitional phase variables. Results: Consistent with the IMV model, motivational and volitional phase variables differentiated the control group from both the ideation and attempt groups. Only volitional phase variables differentiated between the suicide attempt group and the suicidal ideation group; with those reporting a suicide attempt being higher on acquired capability, mental imagery about death, impulsivity, and being more likely to know a friend who had made a suicide attempt. Having a family member or friend die by suicide or a family member attempt suicide did not differentiate between the groups. Limitations: The findings were based on cross-sectional data derived from self-report measures. Conclusions: These findings provide further support for the IMV model, and highlight potential targets for intervention and suicide risk assessment.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherElsevieren_UK
dc.relationWetherall K, Cleare S, Eschle S, Ferguson E, O’Connor DB, O’Carroll RE & O’Connor RC (2018) From ideation to action: differentiating between those who think about suicide and those who attempt suicide in a national study of young adults. Journal of Affective Disorders, 241, pp. 475-483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2018.07.074en_UK
dc.rightsThis item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study. Accepted refereed manuscript of: Wetherall K, Cleare S, Eschle S, Ferguson E, O’Connor DB, O’Carroll RE & O’Connor RC (2018) From ideation to action: differentiating between those who think about suicide and those who attempt suicide in a national study of young adults. Journal of Affective Disorders, 241, pp. 475-483. DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.07.074 © 2018, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectsuicideen_UK
dc.subjectintegrated motivational-volitional model (IMV)en_UK
dc.subjectideation-to-action frameworken_UK
dc.subjecttheoryen_UK
dc.titleFrom ideation to action: differentiating between those who think about suicide and those who attempt suicide in a national study of young adultsen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2019-07-28en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[From ideation to action.pdf] Publisher requires embargo of 12 months after formal publication.en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jad.2018.07.074en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid30149335en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleJournal of Affective Disordersen_UK
dc.citation.issn0165-0327en_UK
dc.citation.volume241en_UK
dc.citation.spage475en_UK
dc.citation.epage483en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusAM - Accepted Manuscripten_UK
dc.author.emailronan.ocarroll@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date27/07/2018en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Glasgowen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Glasgowen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Glasgowen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Nottinghamen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Leedsen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPsychologyen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Glasgowen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000443816800063en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85052078331en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid953020en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-5130-291Xen_UK
dc.date.accepted2018-07-23en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2018-07-24en_UK
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
From ideation to action.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version721.38 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.