|Appears in Collections:||Computing Science and Mathematics Journal Articles|
|Peer Review Status:||Refereed|
|Title:||Perception vs practice: Farmer attitudes towards and uptake of IPM in Scottish spring barley|
Burnett, Fiona J
Ennos, Richard A
Topp, Cairistiona F E
|Keywords:||Integrated pest management|
Farmer decision making
|Citation:||Stetkiewicz S, Bruce A, Burnett FJ, Ennos RA & Topp CFE (2018) Perception vs practice: Farmer attitudes towards and uptake of IPM in Scottish spring barley. Crop Protection, 112, pp. 96-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2018.05.005|
|Abstract:||Integrated Pest Management (IPM) offers a suite of ways by which to reduce the need for pesticide use, thus minimising environmental damage and pathogen resistance build-up in crop production. Farmers and agronomists active in the Scottish spring barley sector were surveyed to determine the extent to which they currently use or are open to implementing three IPM measures – varietal disease resistance, crop rotation, and forecasting disease pressure – in order to control three important fungal diseases. Overall, the survey results demonstrate that farmers and agronomists are open to using the three IPM techniques. However, gaps between actual and perceived recent practice were large: despite over 60% of farmers stating that they sowed varieties highly resistant to Rhynchosporium or Ramularia, less than one third of reportedly sown varieties were highly resistant to these diseases. Similarly, over 80% of farmers indicated that they used crop rotations, yet 66% of farmers also reported sowing consecutive barley often/always. Further research is needed in order to understand why these gaps exist, and how they can be reduced in future in order to increase IPM uptake and optimise pesticide use.|
|Rights:||[Stekiewicz-etal-CropProtection-2018.pdf] Accepted refereed manuscript of: Stetkiewicz S, Bruce A, Burnett FJ, Ennos RA & Topp CFE (2018) Perception vs practice: Farmer attitudes towards and uptake of IPM in Scottish spring barley. Crop Protection, 112, pp. 96-102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2018.05.005 © 2018, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/|
[1-s2.0-S0261219418301261-main.pdf] The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.
|Stekiewicz-etal-CropProtection-2018.pdf||Fulltext - Accepted Version||1.9 MB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
|1-s2.0-S0261219418301261-main.pdf||Fulltext - Published Version||496.32 kB||Adobe PDF||Under Permanent Embargo Request a copy|
This item is protected by original copyright
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.