|Appears in Collections:||Psychology Newspaper/Magazine Articles|
|Title:||How to break the impasse between opposing camps in ivory trade debate|
|Publisher:||The Conversation Trust|
|Citation:||Nowak K, Mutayoba B, Lee P & Harvey R (2018) How to break the impasse between opposing camps in ivory trade debate. The Conversation. 21.05.2018. https://theconversation.com/how-to-break-the-impasse-between-opposing-camps-in-ivory-trade-debate-96489|
|Abstract:||First paragraph: Elephants are in an extremely precarious state in both Africa and Asia. Demand for ivory from Africa has caused significant declines in wild populations. This is now accompanied by new demand for elephant skins from Asia. Resuming trade in elephant parts continues to be one proposal for improving conservation outcomes. But the contention that legal trade will curb poaching is not substantiated by available data. In the modern human economic era, there are few examples of wild animals larger than cattle being sustainably harvested.|
|Rights:||The Conversation uses a Creative Commons Attribution NoDerivatives licence. You can republish their articles for free, online or in print. Licence information is available at: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/|
Sokoine University of Agriculture
|Lee-Conversation-2018.pdf||Fulltext - Published Version||1.18 MB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
This item is protected by original copyright
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.