Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNowak, Katarzynaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMutayoba, Benezethen_UK
dc.contributor.authorLee, Phyllisen_UK
dc.contributor.authorHarvey, Rossen_UK
dc.description.abstractFirst paragraph: Elephants are in an extremely precarious state in both Africa and Asia. Demand for ivory from Africa has caused significant declines in wild populations. This is now accompanied by new demand for elephant skins from Asia. Resuming trade in elephant parts continues to be one proposal for improving conservation outcomes. But the contention that legal trade will curb poaching is not substantiated by available data. In the modern human economic era, there are few examples of wild animals larger than cattle being sustainably harvested.en_UK
dc.publisherThe Conversation Trusten_UK
dc.relationNowak K, Mutayoba B, Lee P & Harvey R (2018) How to break the impasse between opposing camps in ivory trade debate. The Conversation. 21.05.2018.
dc.rightsThe Conversation uses a Creative Commons Attribution NoDerivatives licence. You can republish their articles for free, online or in print. Licence information is available at:
dc.titleHow to break the impasse between opposing camps in ivory trade debateen_UK
dc.typeNewspaper/Magazine Articleen_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationDurham Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSokoine University of Agricultureen_UK
Appears in Collections:Psychology Newspaper/Magazine Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Lee-Conversation-2018.pdfFulltext - Published Version1.18 MBAdobe PDFView/Open

This item is protected by original copyright

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.