Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/27251
Appears in Collections:Law and Philosophy Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Who is in? Who is out? How the Uncitral Transparency Rules Can Influence the Upcoming Amendments of the ICSID Arbitration Rules
Author(s): Yu, Hong-Lin
Contact Email: h.l.yu@stir.ac.uk
Keywords: ICSID amendment
ICSID public comments
The Transparency Rules
access to hearing
confidentiality over arbitration information
Issue Date: 30-Jun-2018
Citation: Yu H (2018) Who is in? Who is out? How the Uncitral Transparency Rules Can Influence the Upcoming Amendments of the ICSID Arbitration Rules. Contemporary Asia Arbitration Journal, 11 (1), pp. 45-72. http://www.ntu.law.acwh.tw/publication_c.php?sid=13&pid=242&page=1
Abstract: The International Center for Settlement of Investment Disputes (hereinafter "ICSID") has started its fourth amendment of its Arbitration Rules since 2016. The issue of transparency has been highlighted as a delicate issue in ICSID ongoing current amendment. It is also listed in the topics that have been identified for potential amendment. This article analyses how the issues of access to hearings and confidentiality over information arising from arbitration is treated under the current framework. A comparison is made against the Transparency Rules. The analysis is also made against the comments received from the public whose views are analysed as a possible direction the amendment may take.
URL: http://www.ntu.law.acwh.tw/publication_c.php?sid=13&pid=242&page=1
Rights: [CAA- transparency 2018-05-08.pdf] This item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study. Please cite as: Yu H (2018) Who is in? Who is out? How the Uncitral Transparency Rules Can Influence the Upcoming Amendments of the ICSID Arbitration Rules. Contemporary Asia Arbitration Journal, 11 (1), pp. 45-72. https://doi.org/10.1787/524613550768
[Who is in_ Who is out_.pdf] The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.
Licence URL(s): https://storre.stir.ac.uk/STORREEndUserLicence.pdf

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Who is in_ Who is out_.pdfFulltext - Published Version755.63 kBAdobe PDFUnder Permanent Embargo    Request a copy
CAA- transparency 2018-05-08.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version455.48 kBAdobe PDFView/Open



This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.