1. STORRE
  2. Faculty of Arts and Humanities
  3. Law and Philosophy
  4. Law and Philosophy Journal Articles
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/27251
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYu, Hong-Linen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-16T22:34:09Z-
dc.date.available2018-05-16T22:34:09Z-
dc.date.issued2018-06-30en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/27251-
dc.description.abstractThe International Center for Settlement of Investment Disputes (hereinafter "ICSID") has started its fourth amendment of its Arbitration Rules since 2016. The issue of transparency has been highlighted as a delicate issue in ICSID ongoing current amendment. It is also listed in the topics that have been identified for potential amendment. This article analyses how the issues of access to hearings and confidentiality over information arising from arbitration is treated under the current framework. A comparison is made against the Transparency Rules. The analysis is also made against the comments received from the public whose views are analysed as a possible direction the amendment may take.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherNational Taiwan Universityen_UK
dc.relationYu H (2018) Who is in? Who is out? How the Uncitral Transparency Rules Can Influence the Upcoming Amendments of the ICSID Arbitration Rules. Contemporary Asia Arbitration Journal, 11 (1), pp. 45-72. http://www.ntu.law.acwh.tw/publication_c.php?sid=13&pid=242&page=1en_UK
dc.rights[CAA- transparency 2018-05-08.pdf] This item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study. Please cite as: Yu H (2018) Who is in? Who is out? How the Uncitral Transparency Rules Can Influence the Upcoming Amendments of the ICSID Arbitration Rules. Contemporary Asia Arbitration Journal, 11 (1), pp. 45-72. https://doi.org/10.1787/524613550768en_UK
dc.rights[Who is in_ Who is out_.pdf] The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttps://storre.stir.ac.uk/STORREEndUserLicence.pdfen_UK
dc.subjectICSID amendmenten_UK
dc.subjectICSID public commentsen_UK
dc.subjectThe Transparency Rulesen_UK
dc.subjectaccess to hearingen_UK
dc.subjectconfidentiality over arbitration informationen_UK
dc.titleWho is in? Who is out? How the Uncitral Transparency Rules Can Influence the Upcoming Amendments of the ICSID Arbitration Rulesen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2018-06-30en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[Who is in_ Who is out_.pdf] The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository therefore there is an embargo on the full text of the work.en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[CAA- transparency 2018-05-08.pdf] Until this work is published there will be an embargo on the full text of this work.en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleContemporary Asia Arbitration Journalen_UK
dc.citation.issn1999-9747en_UK
dc.citation.issn1999-9747en_UK
dc.citation.volume11en_UK
dc.citation.issue1en_UK
dc.citation.spage45en_UK
dc.citation.epage72en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.type.statusAM - Accepted Manuscripten_UK
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.ntu.law.acwh.tw/publication_c.php?sid=13&pid=242&page=1en_UK
dc.author.emailh.l.yu@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationLawen_UK
dc.identifier.wtid895041en_UK
dc.date.accepted2018-05-15en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2018-05-15en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2018-05-16en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionAMen_UK
local.rioxx.authorYu, Hong-Lin|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2018-06-30en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||2018-06-30en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttps://storre.stir.ac.uk/STORREEndUserLicence.pdf|2018-06-30|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameCAA- transparency 2018-05-08.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount2en_UK
local.rioxx.source1999-9747en_UK
Appears in Collections:Law and Philosophy Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Who is in_ Who is out_.pdfFulltext - Published Version755.63 kBAdobe PDFUnder Permanent Embargo    Request a copy
CAA- transparency 2018-05-08.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version455.48 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright

View License
Show simple item record


Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.