Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/27216
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFialova, Jitkaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorSorokowska, Agnieszkaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorRoberts, S Craigen_UK
dc.contributor.authorKubicova, Lydieen_UK
dc.contributor.authorHavlicek, Janen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-09T22:52:49Z-
dc.date.available2018-05-09T22:52:49Z-
dc.date.issued2018-05-07en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/27216-
dc.description.abstractIt is well established that composite facial images are perceived as more attractive compared with individual images, suggesting a preference for heterozygosity. Similarly, there is evidence that preferences for body odours might be linked to heterozygosity. Here, we tested whether blending individual body odours into composites would follow a similar pattern as observed in the perception of faces. We collected axillary odour samples from 38 individuals, which were subsequently assessed individually and as composites of two (N=19) or four (N=9) body odours regarding their pleasantness, attractiveness and intensity. We found no significant differences between mean ratings of individual odour samples or composites of two or four odour samples. Our results indicate that, in contrast to faces, composite body odours are not rated as more attractive. Composite body odours retain similar hedonic perceptual qualities as individual odours, thus highlighting differences in visual and chemosensory perceptual mechanisms.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherSAGEen_UK
dc.relationFialova J, Sorokowska A, Roberts SC, Kubicova L & Havlicek J (2018) Human Body Odour Composites Are Not Perceived More Positively than the Individual Samples. i-Perception, 9 (3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669518766367en_UK
dc.rightsCreative Commons CC-BY: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectheterozygosityen_UK
dc.subjectaveragenessen_UK
dc.subjectodour blenden_UK
dc.subjectolfactionen_UK
dc.subjectMHCen_UK
dc.subjectmate preferencesen_UK
dc.titleHuman Body Odour Composites Are Not Perceived More Positively than the Individual Samplesen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/2041669518766367en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid29770184en_UK
dc.citation.jtitlei-Perceptionen_UK
dc.citation.issn2041-6695en_UK
dc.citation.volume9en_UK
dc.citation.issue3en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.author.emailcraig.roberts@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date30/04/2018en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationCharles University in Pragueen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationDresden University of Technologyen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPsychologyen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationCharles University in Pragueen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationCharles University in Pragueen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000432076200001en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85049904560en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid875390en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-9641-6101en_UK
dc.date.accepted2018-02-26en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2018-02-26en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2018-05-09en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorFialova, Jitka|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorSorokowska, Agnieszka|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorRoberts, S Craig|0000-0002-9641-6101en_UK
local.rioxx.authorKubicova, Lydie|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorHavlicek, Jan|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2018-05-09en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2018-05-09|en_UK
local.rioxx.filename2041669518766367.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2041669518766367.pdfFulltext - Published Version314.37 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.